Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T18:46:07.605Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometric Light Trapping in 2D and 3D Structured Small Molecule Organic Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 January 2013

Marcos Soldera
Affiliation:
Departamento de Electrotecnia, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET, Argentina
Emiliano Estrada
Affiliation:
Departamento de Electrotecnia, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET, Argentina
Kurt Taretto
Affiliation:
Departamento de Electrotecnia, Universidad Nacional del Comahue - CONICET, Argentina
Get access

Abstract

Despite organic solar cells have recently shown remarkable high power conversion efficiencies approaching 10%, further improvements are required to provide a low-cost alternative to inorganic photovoltaics. Optical losses related to insufficient light trapping and parasitic absorption of the contact layers limit drastically the photocurrent delivered by the cells. Textured surfaces, such as V-grooves (2D) and pyramids (3D), can provide better light coupling into the conformally deposited solar cells. In this work, we analyze the enhancement in light absorption in textured solar cells based on copper phtalocyanine (CuPc) and fullerene (C60) on the micro- and submicroscale. The analysis is carried out with the aid of the finite element method in 2D and 3D, taking into account interference as well as reflection and refraction of the incident AM1.5G spectrum. The results show that both type of structured cells perform better than planar cells reaching up to 23% improvement in maximum photocurrent for normal incidence. We also explore the lateral inhomogeneities of the generation rate within the active layers and their potential effect on the exciton collection efficiency.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Green, M.A., Emery, K., Hishikawa, Y., Warta, W., and Dunlop, E.D., Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 20, 1220 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, C.W., Appl. Phys. Lett. 48, 183 (1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rand, B.P., Genoe, J., Heremans, P., and Poortmans, J., Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 15, 659 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peumans, P., Yakimov, A., and Forrest, S.R., J. Appl. Phys. 93, 3693 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brendel, R. and Scholten, D., Appl. Phys. A-Mater. 69, 201 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorp, D., Campbell, P., and Wenham, S.R., Prog. Photovoltaics Res. Appl. 4, 205224 (1996).3.0.CO;2-D>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rim, S.-B., Zhao, S., Scully, S.R., McGehee, M.D., and Peumans, P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 91, 243501 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peumans, P. and Forrest, S.R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 79, 126 (2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotlarski, J.D., Blom, P.W.M., Koster, L.J.A., Lenes, M., and Slooff, L.H., J. Appl. Phys. 103, 084502 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cheyns, D., Gommans, H., Odijk, M., Poortmans, J., and Heremans, P., Sol. Energ. Mat. Sol. C. 91, 399 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Z.T., Kwok, H.S., and Djurisic, A.B., J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 37, 678 (2004).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
COMSOL AB, RF Module User’s Guide, COMSOL 3.5a (2008).Google Scholar
Lorenzo, E., in Handbook of Photovoltaic Science and Engineering, edited by Luque, A. and Hegedus, S., (Wiley, West Sussex, 2011), p. 991.Google Scholar
Pettersson, L.A.A., Roman, L.S., and Inganas, O., J. Appl. Phys. 86, 487 (1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hecht, E., Optics, 4th ed. (Addison Wesley, San Francisco, 2002), p. 113.Google Scholar