Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:10:19.157Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gelation Characteristics and Encapsulation of Stromal Cells in Star Acrylate-Functionalized Poly(ethylene glycol-co-lactide) Macromonomers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2012

Seyedsina Moeinzadeh
Affiliation:
Biomimetic Materials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Danial Barati
Affiliation:
Biomimetic Materials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Xuezhong He
Affiliation:
Biomimetic Materials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Esmaiel Jabbari
Affiliation:
Biomimetic Materials and Tissue Engineering Laboratory, University of South Carolina Columbia, SC 29208, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

In this work, a novel star 4-arm poly(ethylene glycol-co-lactide) acrylate macromonomer (SPELA) is synthesized, and the effect of macromonomer concentration and architecture on modulus, swelling ratio and sol fraction is investigated. The results show that the storage modulus of the hydrogel had an increasing trend with polymer concentration. Changing the polymer architecture from linear to 4-arm increased the storage modulus by 2.2-fold. The water content depended on the hydrophilic segment density as well as the extent of crosslinking and showed a decreasing trend with macromonomer concentration. The sol fractions of the SPELA hydrogels changed from 13% to 5% when concentration increased from 10% to 25%. The star SPELA hydrogel with high modulus, fast gelation time, and low sol fraction is potential useful as a degradable carrier in cell-based therapies. Results show that the SPELA hydrogel supports viability and osteogenic differentiation of the encapsulated bone marrow stromal cells.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Bryant, S.J. and Anseth, K.S., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 64, 70 (2003).Google Scholar
2. Sarvestani, A.S., He, X. and Jabbari, E.. Biomacromolecules 8, 406 (2007).Google Scholar
3. Hou, Q., De Bank, P.A. and Shakesheff, K.M.. J. Mater. Chem. 14, 1915 (2004).Google Scholar
4. Amsden, B.G., Misra, G., Gu, F., Younes, H.M.. Biomacromolecules 5, 2479 (2004).Google Scholar
5. Posocco, P., Fermeglia, M. and Pricl, S., J. Mater. Chem. 20, 7742 (2010).Google Scholar
6. Sarvestani, A.S., Xu, W., He, X. and Jabbari, E., Polymer 48, 7113 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Oberti, T.G., Cortizo, M.S., Alessandrini, J.L., J. Macromol. Sci. 47, 725 (2010).Google Scholar
8. Rey, A., Freire, J.J., Bishop, M. and Clarke, J.H.R., Macromolecules 25, 1311 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Moeinzadeh, S., Khorasani, S.N., Ma, J., He, X. and Jabbari, E. Polymer 52, 3887 (2011).Google Scholar
10. He, X., Ma, J. and Jabbari, E. Langmuir 24, 12508 (2008).Google Scholar
11. Odian, G.. Principles of polymerization, New York: John Wiley (1981).Google Scholar
12. Wadajkar, A.S., Koppolu, B., Rahimi, M. and Nguyen, K.T. J. Nanopart. Res. 11, 1375 (2009).Google Scholar