Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T20:38:10.777Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Ge Nanocrystals Grown on Si(111) by Molecular Beam Epitaxy with and without CaF2 Buffer Layers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Peter W. Deelman
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics and Center for Integrated Electronics, Troy, NY 12180
Thomas Thundat
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, P.O. Box 2008, Oak Ridge, TN 37831
Leo J. Schowalter
Affiliation:
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Department of Physics and Center for Integrated Electronics, Troy, NY 12180
Get access

Abstract

The Stranski-Krastanov growth mode of Ge thin films on Si and the clustering behavior of Ge on calcium fluoride have been exploited to grow self-assembled nanocrystals by molecular beam epitaxy. The growth of the samples was monitored in situ with RHEED, and they were analyzed ex situ with AFM and RBS. For each system (Ge/Si and Ge/CaF2/Si), the dependence of Ge islanding on substrate temperature and on substrate misorientation was studied. When grown on Si(111) at temperatures between 500°C and 700°C, Ge clusters nucleated at step edges on vicinal wafers and nucleated homogeneously on on-axis wafers. Above 600°C, no transition to a spotty RHEED pattern, which would be expected for island growth, was observed for the vicinal samples. Ge grown at 500°C on on-axis Si(111) formed islands with a relatively narrow size distribution, typically 160nm in diameter and 10nm to 20nm in height. When grown on a CaF2 buffer layer, Ge islands nucleated homogeneously at a substrate temperature of 750°C, resulting in randomly distributed, oblate crystallites approximately 100nm to 200nm in diameter. At 650°C and 700°C, although we still observed many randomly distributed, small crystallites, most islands nucleated at step bunches and had a length scale of over 500nm.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Gossmann, H.J. and Feldman, L.C., Appl. Phys. A 38, 171 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Eaglesham, D.J. and Cerullo, M., Phys. Rev. Let. 64, 1943 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Snyder, C.W., Orr, B.G., Kessler, D., and Sander, L.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3032 (1991).Google Scholar
4 Leonard, D., Krishnamurthy, M., Reaves, C.M., Denbaars, S.P., and Petroff, P.M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3203 (1993).Google Scholar
5 Krishnamurthy, M., Drucker, J.S., and Venables, J.A., J. Appl. Phys. 69, 6461 (1991).Google Scholar
6 LeGoues, F.K., Reuter, M.C., Tersoff, J., Hammar, M., and Tromp, R.M., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 300 (1994).Google Scholar
7 Kern, W., Engineer, RCA 28, 99 (1983).Google Scholar
8 Taylor, A.P., Yang, K., and Schowalter, L.J., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 9, 3181 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Fathauer, R.W., Lewis, N., Hall, E.L., and Schowalter, L.J., J. Appl. Phys. 60, 3886 (1986)Google Scholar