Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T02:47:45.743Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Further Studies of Synroc Immobilization of HLW Sludges and Tc for Hanford Tank Waste Remediation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

E.R. Vance
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
K.P. Hart
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
M.L. Carter
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
M.J. Hambley
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
R.A. Day
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
B.D. Begg
Affiliation:
Materials Division, ANSTO, Menai, NSW 2234, Australia
Get access

Abstract

Synroc/glass composites were designed for simulated Hanford HLW sludges containing U (the current “All-Blend” formulation). The composite contained ∼ 50 wt% of simulated HLW (oxide equivalent), to which ∼ 6, 10, 10, and 24 wt% of CaO, Al2O3, TiO2 and SiO2 were added, and melted under an argon atmosphere at 1350°C. The phase assemblage consisted of zirconolite, perovskite, spinel, nepheline, whitlockite and glass as major phases. Seven-day PCT tests yielded values of < 0. 1 g/m2 for all elements studied. The PCT results were tolerant to changes of ∼ 20% of the inventories of the additives, and to variations in redox conditions.

Technetium separated out during decontamination of liquid Hanford wastes can be incorporated as metal in hot-pressed Synroc prepared under reducing conditions, and its leach resistance is good (∼ 10∼3 g/m2/day at 70°C), and can be improved by alloying with iron group metals. With a choice of “neutral” (P(O2) ∼ 10−4 atm., near the Ni/NiO buffer) hot-pressing conditions, Tc can also be incorporated as Tc4+, substituting for Ti4+ in the ceramic phases, and in this form, it should be highly leach resistant also.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1 Vance, E. R., Day, R. A., Carter, M. L. and Jostsons, A. (1996), in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, Eds. Murphy, W. M. and Knecht, D. A., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, p.289.Google Scholar
2 Vance, E. R., Hart, K. P., Day, R. A., Carter, M. L., Hambley, M., Blackford, M. G. and Begg, B. D. (1997), in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XX, Eds. Gray, W. J. and Triay, I. R., Materials Research Society, Pittsburgh, PA, in press.Google Scholar
3 Vance, E. R., Day, R. A., Zhang, Z., Begg, B. D., Ball, C. J. and Blackford, M. G. 9(1996), J. Solid State Chem., 124, 77.Google Scholar
4 Begg, B. D., Vance, E. R., Hanna, J. V. and Hunter, B. A., J. Mater. Res., submitted.Google Scholar
5 Sobolev, I.A., Lifanov, F.A., Dimitriev, S.A., Stefanovsky, S.V. and Kobolev, A.P., in Spectrum '94. Nuclear and Hazardous Waste Management International Topical Meeting (Atlanta, GA, USA, 1994) p.2250 Google Scholar
6 Khalil, M. Y. (1984), Ph. D. Thesis, Pennsylvania State University, unpublished.Google Scholar