Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:27:06.080Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Formation of Helical Dislocations in Silicon Substrates During Epitaxial Deposition of β- SiC

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

M. Aindow
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, University Circle, Cleveland, OH 44106.
T. T. Cheng
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, University Circle, Cleveland, OH 44106.
P. Pirouz
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Case Western Reserve University, University Circle, Cleveland, OH 44106.
Get access

Abstract

A study is presented of the dislocation content of (001) Si substrates after the formation of thin epitaxial “buffer layers” of beta-SiC by the pyrolysis of propane. Helical dislocations are observed running parallel to the interface and extending for many microns. The dislocation helices emanate from the substrate, have 1/2<110> Burgers vectors which are inclined to the interface, and do not lie on the {111} glide planes. This is consistent with the extension of dislocations in the substrate by climb. The extended segments are subsequently pinned and further climb gives rise to the observed helical configuration. These climb effects are presumably due to an excess of vacancies which are produced when Si interstitials migrate to the deposit in order to form SiC.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Nishino, S., Powell, J. A. and Will, H. A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 42, 490 (1983).Google Scholar
[2] Cheng, T. T., Pirouz, P. and Powell, J. A. in Chemistry and Defects in Semiconductor Heterostructures, edited by Kawanabe, M., Weber, E. R., Sands, T. D. and Williams, R. S., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 148, 1989) 229.Google Scholar
[3] Cheng, T. T., Ph.D, Case Western Reserve University, (1990).Google Scholar
[4] Powell, J. A., Matus, L. G. and Kuscmarski, M., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134, 1558 (1987).Google Scholar
[5] Shifrin, S.S. and Markov, A. V., Izv. Acad. Nauk. SSSR Krist. 25, 1089 (1980) [Sov. Phys. Crystallogr. 25, 625 (1981)Google Scholar
[6] Seitz, F., Phys. Rev. 22, 408 (1953)Google Scholar
[7] Bontinck, W. and Amelinckx, S., Phil. Mag. 2, 94 (1957).Google Scholar
[8] Tweet, A. G., J. Appl. Phys. 29, 1520 (1958).Google Scholar
[9] Westmacott, K. H., Barnes, R. S., Hull, D. and Smallman, R. E., Phil. Mag. 6, 929 (1960).Google Scholar
[10] Amelinckx, S., Bontinck, W., Dekeyser, W. and Seitz, F., Phil. Mag. 2, 355 (1957).Google Scholar
[11] Dash, W.C., J. Appl. Phys. 31, 2275 (1960).Google Scholar
[12] Strunk, H., Gbsele, U. and Kolbesen, B. O., Appl. Phys. Lett. 34, 530 (1979).Google Scholar
[13] Powell, J. A., private communication.Google Scholar
[14] Maher, D. M. and Eyre, B. L., Phil Mag 23,409 (1971).Google Scholar