Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T22:24:01.014Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Formation of Ge Nanocrystals Passivated with Si by Gas Evaporation of Si and Ge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Junjie Si
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
H. Ono
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
K. Uchida
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
S. Nozaki
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
H. Morisaki
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, University of Electro-Communications, Chofu-shi, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan
Get access

Abstract

Two methods are employed in the gas evaporation technique to form Ge nanocrystals with the Si-passivated surface. One uses one boat with a SiGe alloy as a source, and the other uses two boats each with Si and Ge. As a result of characterization by the x-ray diffraction (XRD) measurement, Raman scattering and x-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS), it is found that Ge nanocrystals with the Si-passivated surface were formed by coevaporation of Si and Ge from two boats, while SiGe alloy nanocrystals were formed by evaporation of the Si-Ge alloy source from one boat.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Schmidt, O. G., Lange, C., and Eberl, K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 1905 (1999).Google Scholar
2. Zhu, J. H., Miesner, C., Brunner, K., and Abstreiter, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 75, 2395(1999).Google Scholar
3. Magidson, V., Regelman, D.V., and Beserman, R., Appl. Phys. Lett. 73, 1044 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Larciprete, R., Padova, P. De, Quaresima, C., Ottaviani, C., and Perfetti, P., Phys. Rev. B 61, 16006 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Campbell, I. H. and Fauchet, P. M., Solid State Commun. 58, 739 (1986)Google Scholar
6. Achiq, A., Rizk, R., Gourbilleau, F., Madelon, R., Barrido, B., Perez-Rodriguez, A., and Morante, J. R., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 5797 (1998).Google Scholar
7. Garrido, B., Perez-Rodriguez, A., Morante, J. R., Achiq, A., Gourbilleau, F., and Rizk, R., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 16, 1851(1998).Google Scholar
8. Alonso, M. I. and Winer, K., Phys. Rev. B 39, 10056 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Kwok, S. H., Yu, P. Y., Tung, C. H., Zhang, Y. H., Li, M. F., Peng, C. S. and Zhou, J. M., Phsy. Rev. B 59, 4980 (1999).Google Scholar