Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T14:44:21.258Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Finite-Element Modeling of Residual Stress in SiC Diaphragms

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Russell G. DeAnna
Affiliation:
Microfabrication Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering & Applied Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Christian A. Zorman
Affiliation:
Microfabrication Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering & Applied Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Mehran Mehregany
Affiliation:
Microfabrication Laboratory, Department of Electrical Engineering & Applied Physics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106
Get access

Abstract

Finite-element modeling of the residual stress due to expansion-coefficient mismatch between a 3C-SiC film and Si substrate is presented. The change in residual stress after bulk etching of the silicon substrate to create a suspended diaphragm is also presented. 1, 2, or 3 μm-thick 3C-SiC films are grown at 1600 K on a 100 mm diameter, 500 μm-thick, (100) Si substrate using atmospheric pressure chemical vapor deposition (APCVD) in a cold-wall, vertical-geometry, RF-induction-heated reactor. An axisymmetric, finite-element analysis (FEA) of the cooling and etching process is presented using the ANSYS54 finite-element package. The etching process is modeled by removing the Si elements in the etched region after cooling from film-growth to room temperature. The results show that residual stress in the diaphragm decreases from 3 to 8 percent after etching.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Zeirmann, J, Berg, von, Reichert, W., Obermeier, E., Eickhoff, M., and Kroetz, G., Technical Digest – International Conference on Solid State Sensors and Actuators, Chicago, IL, (1997) 1411.Google Scholar
2 Zorman, C.A., Fleischman, A.J., Dewa, A., Mehregany, M., Jacob, C., Nishino, S., and Pirouz, P., J. Appl. Phys, 78, 5136, (1995).Google Scholar
3 Mehregany, M., Tong, L., Matus, L.G., and Larkin, D., IEEE Trans. Electron Devices, 44, 74, (1997).Google Scholar
4 Su, C.M., Fekade, A., Spencer, M., and Wuttig, M., J. Appl. Phys., 77, 1280, (1995).Google Scholar
5 Su, C.M., Wuttig, M., Fekade, A., and Spencer, M., J. Appl. Phys., 77, 5611, (1995).Google Scholar
6 Chandra, K., Characterization of Residual Stress and Elastic Modulus of Silicon Carbide Films Grown on Silicon by APCVD, M.S. Thesis, (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1997).Google Scholar
7 Berg, J. Von et al. , Transactions of the 3rd Int. HiTEC, Alburquerque, NM (1996).Google Scholar
8 Tong, L., Silicon Carbide as a New Material for Micromechanics, M.S. Thesis, (Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, 1993).Google Scholar
9 ANSYS, Inc., Canonsburg, PA 15317.Google Scholar
10 Reeber, R.R. and Wang, K., Mat. Chem. And Phy 46, 259264 (1996).Google Scholar
11 Reeber, R.R. and Wang, K. in Thermal Expansion of P-SiC, GaP and InP, Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 410, 1996) pp. 211216.Google Scholar
12 Dobelin, E. O., Measurement Systems, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1975), p. 271.Google Scholar