Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T23:09:08.529Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Factors Affecting the Mechanical Properties of Cu/Electroless Ni-P/Sn-3.5Ag Solder Joints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Aditya Kumar
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, N4.1-B3-02,, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore, +65 6316 8955, +65 6790 9081
Zhong Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore
C. C. Wong
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore
S. G. Mhaisalkar
Affiliation:
[email protected], Nanyang Technological University, School of Materials Science and Engineering, 50 Nanyang Avenue, Singapore, 639798, Singapore
Vaidhyanathan Kripesh
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institute of Microelectronics, 11 Science Park Road, Singapore, 117685, Singapore
Get access

Abstract

This work investigates the factors that affect the mechanical properties of Cu/electroless Ni-P/Sn-3.5Ag solder joints. For the investigation, solder joints were tensile tested after solid-state aging at different temperatures for various durations. Several factors, such as the growth of interfacial compounds (IFCs), Ni3Sn4 morphology, the accumulation of spalled Ni3Sn4 intermetallic particles at the solder/Ni3Sn4 interface, and the formation of Kirkendall voids at the Ni3P/Cu interface, are found to deteriorate the mechanical properties of the joints. Among all these factors, the formation of a layer of Kirkendall voids at the Ni3P/Cu interface, which is a result of Cu diffusion from the interface, causes the most severe decrease in tensile strength with a brittle fracture at the Ni3P/Cu interface. This layer of Kirkendall voids remains the main cause of brittle failure even after the transformation of the Ni3P layer into a Ni-Sn-P layer.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jang, J. W., Kim, P. G., Tu, K. N., Frear, D. R., and Thompson, P., J. Appl. Phys. 85, 8456 (1999).Google Scholar
2. He, M., Kumar, A., Yeo, P.T., Qi, G.J., and Chen, Z., Thin Solid Films 462–463, 387 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Matsuki, H., Ibuka, H., and Saka, H., Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater. 3, 261 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Kumar, A., Chen, Z., Mhaisalkar, S., Wong, C. C., Teo, P. S., and Kripesh, V., Thin Solid Films 504, 410 (2006).Google Scholar
5. ASM International Handbook Committee, Surface Engineering, vol. 5 (ASM International, Materials Park, OH, 1994) p. 295.Google Scholar
6. Qualitek (2006). http://www.qualitek.com/ppalloyc.html: Physical property alloy comparison analysis.Google Scholar
7. Furuseth, S. and Fjellvag, H., Acta Chemica Scandinavica A 39, 537 (1985).Google Scholar
8. Chen, Z., He, M., and Qi, G., J. Electron. Mater. 33, 1465 (2004).10.1007/s11664-004-0088-8Google Scholar