Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:10:38.305Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Evaluating the corrosion rate of low alloyed steel in Callovo-Oxfordian clay: towards a complementary EIS, gravimetric and structural study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2012

Frantz A. Martin ,
Stéphane Perrin  and
Christian Bataillon
Frantz A. Martin
Affiliation:
CEA, DEN, DPC, SCCME, Laboratoire d’Etude de la Corrosion Aqueuse, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette
Stéphane Perrin
Affiliation:
CEA, DEN, DPC, SCCME, Laboratoire d’Etude de la Corrosion Aqueuse, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette
Christian Bataillon
Affiliation:
CEA, DEN, DPC, SCCME, Laboratoire d’Etude de la Corrosion Aqueuse, F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette
Get access

Abstract

Dedicated integrated experiments have been used to determine in situ the corrosion rate of low alloyed steels in geological repository mockups (90°C, anaerobic, 40 bars, slow synthetic water flux…). Two possible situations have been investigated: the steel can either be in direct contact with the host rock or in a solution rich in clay suspension. Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy (EIS), sampling gravimetry and microanalyses have been performed to determine the corrosion rate evolution with the exposure duration of the specimens. Kinetic regime modifications have been linked to structural modifications of the corrosion products interface.

Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1475: Symposium NW – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XXXV , 2012 , imrc11-1475-nw35-o17
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Neff, D., Reguer, S., Bellot-Gurlet, L., Dillmann, P., and Bertholon, R., J. Raman Spec. 35, 739 (2004).10.1002/jrs.1130Google Scholar
2. Neff, D., Dillmann, P., Bellot-Gurlet, L., and Berranger, G., Corros. Sci. 47, 515 (2005).10.1016/j.corsci.2004.05.029Google Scholar
3. Martin, F.A., Bataillon, C., and Schlegel, M.L., J. Nucl. Mater. 379, 80 (2008).10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.06.021Google Scholar
4. Papillon, F., Jullien, M., and Bataillon, C., in International Workshop on Prediction of Long Term Corrosion Behaviour in Nuclear Waste Systems, edited by Féron, D. and MacDonald, D.D. (Maney Publishing, 2001), pp. 440–454.Google Scholar
5. Carlson, L., Karnland, O., Oversby, V.M., Rance, A.P., Smart, N.R., Snellman, M., Vahanen, M., and Werme, L.O., Phys. Chem. Earth 32, 334 (2007).10.1016/j.pce.2005.12.009Google Scholar
6. Schlegel, M.L., Bataillon, C., Benhamida, K., Blanc, C., Menut, D., and Lacour, J.-L., Appl. Geochem. 23, 2619 (2008).10.1016/j.apgeochem.2008.05.019Google Scholar
7. Schlegel, M.L., Bataillon, C., Blanc, C., Prêt, D., and Foy, E., Environ. Sci. & Techn. 44, 1503 (2010).10.1021/es9021987Google Scholar
8. Rivard, C., Pelletier, M., Villiéras, F., Analyses des essais batch CEA-LEM, ANDRA report (2008).Google Scholar
9. Didot, A., PhD. Thesis, Université Technologique de Compiègne, France, 2008.Google Scholar