Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:41:13.434Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Esr of Purified Carbon Nanotubes Produced Under Different Helium Pressures

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

S. P. Wong
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Haiyan Zhang
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Ning Ke
Affiliation:
Department of Electronic Engineering, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China
Shaoqi Peng
Affiliation:
Department of Physics, Zhongshan University, Guangzhou 510275, China
Get access

Abstract

Carbon nanotubes were prepared by the dc arc-discharge method under a controlled helium pressure ranging from 10 to 80 kPa and subsequently purified by oxidation in air. The purified carbon nanotubes were observed by transmission electron microscopy. The room temperature electron spin resonance (ESR) spectra of the purified nanotubes were measured. The variations in the ESR line shape, g-value, linewidth and relative spin density of the purified nanotubes on helium pressure were studied and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Mintmire, J.W., Bunlap, B.I. and White, C.T., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 631.Google Scholar
[2] White, C.T., Robertson, D.H. and Mintmire, J.W., Phys. Rev. B47 (1993) 5485.Google Scholar
[3] Hamada, N., Sawada, S. and Oshiyamu, A., Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992) 1579.Google Scholar
[4] Saito, R., Dresseihaus, G. and Dresseihaus, M.S., J. Appl. Phys. 73 (1993) 494.Google Scholar
[5] Ebbesen, T.W. and Ajayan, P.M., Nature 358 (1992) 220.Google Scholar
[6] Ebbesen, T.W., Lezec, H.J., Hiura, H., Bennett, J.W., Ghaemi, H.F., Thio, T., Nature 382 (1996)54.Google Scholar
[7] Tanaka, K., Sato, T., Yamabe, T., Okahara, K., Uchida, K., Yumura, M., Niino, H., Ohshima, S., Kuriki, Y., Yase, K. and Ikazaki, F., Chem. Phys. Lett. 223 (1994) 65.Google Scholar
[8] Kosaka, M., Ebbesen, T.W., Hiura, H. and Tanigaki, K., Chem. Phys. Lett. 225 (1994) 161; Chem. Phys. Lett. 233 (1995) 47.10.1016/0009-2614(94)00641-5Google Scholar
[9] Wagoner, G., Phys. Rev. 118 (1960) 647.10.1103/PhysRev.118.647Google Scholar
[10] Singer, L.S. and Wagoner, G., J. Chem. Phys. 37 (1962) 1812.Google Scholar
[11] Ebbesen, T.W., Ajayan, P.M., Hiura, H. and Tanigaki, K., Nature 367 (1994) 519.10.1038/367519a0Google Scholar
[12] Mintmire, J.W., Robertson, D.H. and White, C.T., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 54 (1993) 1835.Google Scholar
[13] Feher, G. and Kip, A.F., Phys. Rev. 98 (1955) 337.10.1103/PhysRev.98.337Google Scholar
[14] Zhang, H., Wang, D., Xue, X., Chen, B. and Peng, S., J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 30 (1997) L1.10.1088/0022-3727/30/3/001Google Scholar