Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:59:01.840Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Epitaxial KNbo3 and its Nonlinear Optical Properties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Barbara M. Nichols
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Bruce W. Wessels
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
John A. Belot
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Tobin J. Marks
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL 60208
Get access

Abstract

The nonlinear optical properties of epitaxial KNbO3 were studied for films grown by metalorganic chemical vapor deposition on different substrates. X-ray diffraction revealed epitaxial KNbO3 with a (110) orientation for layers deposited on single crystal strontium titanate. Whereas, films grown on (100) spinel exhibited a multi-variant structure, consisting of the (110) and (001) orientations. The volume fraction of each crystallographic variant in the film was calculated. Second harmonic generation measurements at 532 nm were performed to determine the ferroelectric domain variants present. The Maker-fringe technique was employed to obtain the effective nonlinear optical susceptibility of the films, which ranged from 0.1 - 1.8 pm/V. The SHG intensity profiles reveal a strong dependence upon substrate type.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1999

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Nystrom, M. J., Wessels, B. W., Studebaker, D. B., Marks, T. J., Lin, W. P., and Wong, C. K., Appl. Phys. Lett. 67 (1995) 367.Google Scholar
2. Thöny, S. Scbwyn, in Epitaxial Oxide Thin Films and Heterostructures, edited by Fork, D. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 341, Pittsburgh, PA, 1994) pp. 253264.Google Scholar
3. Zaldo, C., Gill, D. S., Eason, R. W., Mendiola, J., and Chandler, P. J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 65 502 (1994).Google Scholar
4. Gopalan, V. and Raj, R., J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 1825 (1996)Google Scholar
5. Nystrom, M. J. and Wessels, B. W., in Solid-State Chemistry of Inorganic Materials, edited by Davies, P. K., Jacobson, A. J., Torardi, C. C., and Vanderah, T. A. (Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 453 Pittsburgh PA, 1997) pp. 259264.Google Scholar
6. Maker, P. D., Terhune, R. W., Nisenoff, M., and Savage, C. M., Phys. Rev. Lett., 8 21 (1962).Google Scholar
7. Jerphagnon, J. and Kurtz, S. K., J. Appl. Phys., 41 1667 (1970).Google Scholar
8. Herman, W. N. and Hayden, L. M., J. Opt. Soc. Am. B. 12 416 (1995).Google Scholar
9. Nystrom, M. J. (private communication).Google Scholar
10. Tang, C. L. in Handbook of Optics Vol II: Devices Measurements, and Properties, 2nd ed., edited by Bass, M. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995), p. 38.22. Google Scholar
11. Uematsu, Y., Jap. J. Appl. Phys., 13 1362 (1974).Google Scholar
12. Jang, J. W., Chung, S. J., Cho, W. J., Hahn, T. S., and Choi, S. S., J. Appl. Phys. 81 6322 (1997).Google Scholar