Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T03:21:38.209Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Epitaxial Influence of Textured Conducting Metal Oxide Templates on Electrodeposited Ag(Ag3O4)2N03

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Bryan E. Breyfogle  and
Richard J. Phillips
Bryan E. Breyfogle
Affiliation:
Jay A. Switzer University of Missouri-Rolla, Graduate Center for Materials Research, Rolla, MO 65401.
Richard J. Phillips
Affiliation:
Jay A. Switzer University of Missouri-Rolla, Graduate Center for Materials Research, Rolla, MO 65401.
Get access

Abstract

The conducting oxysalt Ag(Ag3O4)2NO3 has been electrodeposited onto highly oriented conducting oxides of Tl2 03 and Pb0.8Tl0.2O1.9. T12O3 was grown in a [100] texture while the Pb0.8Tl0.2O1.9 was grown with two different thickness-dependent textures of [110] and [210]. The orientation of the Ag(Ag3O4)2NO3 crystals with respect to the substrate surface was determined by x-ray diffraction. The face-centered-cubic Ag(Ag3O4)2N03 crystals deposited on body-centered-cubic T12 03 and face-centered-cubic Pb0.8Tl0.2O1.9 followed the orientation of these prelayers. However, Ag(Ag3O4)2N03 which was electrodeposited onto polycrystalline 430 stainless steel had a nearly random orientation. The lattice mismatch is 6.6% between T12 03 and Ag(Ag3O4)2N03, and it is 7.8% between Ag(Ag3O4)2N03 and the doubled unit cell of Pb0.8Tl0.2Ol.9.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 280: Symposium B – Evolution of Surface and Thin Film Microstructure , 1992 , 359
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Sulc, O.Z., Z. Anorg. Chem. 12, 89 (1896).Google Scholar
2. Brown, M., J. Phys. Chem. 20, 680 (1916).Google Scholar
3. Bailar, J.C. Jr, J. Chem Educ. 21, 523 (1944).Google Scholar
4. McMillan, J.A., Chem. Rev. 62, 65 (1962).Google Scholar
5. Hindermann, D.K., Robin, M.B., Kuebler, N.A., J. Magn. Resonance 1, 479 (1969).Google Scholar
6. Naray-Szabo, I., Arbay, G., and Szabo, P., Acta Cryst. 19, 180 (1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Conway, M.M., Phillips, N.E., Geballe, T.H., Kuebler, N.A., and McWhan, D.B., Phys. Rev. Lett. 17, 917 (1970).Google Scholar
8. Bauer, E.G. et al., J. Mater. Res. 5, 852 (1990).Google Scholar
9. Switzer, J.A., Shane, M.J., and Phillips, R.J., Science 247, 444 (1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Switzer, J.A., J. Electrochem. Soc. 133, 722 (1986).Google Scholar
11. Phillips, R.J., Shane, M.J., and Switzer, J.A., J. Mater. Res. 4, 923 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Switzer, J.A., Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 66, 1521 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Michailova, E. and Milchev, A., J. Appl. Electrochem. 18, 614 (1988).Google Scholar
14. Breyfogle, B.E., Phillips, R.J., and Switzer, J.A., Chem. Mater. 4 (6), 0000 (1992), in press.Google Scholar