Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-ndw9j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:40:06.369Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Enhancement of the Thermoelectric Figure of Merit in Gated Bismuth Telluride Nanowires

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Igor Bejenari
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California at Riverside, Electrical Engineering, Riverside, California, United States
Valeriu Kantser
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institute of Electronic Engineering & Industrial Technologies, Kishinev, Moldova
Alexander Balandin
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California at Riverside, Electrical Engineering, Riverside, California, United States
Get access

Abstract

We theoretically studied how the electric filed effect can modify thermoelectric properties of intrinsic bismuth telluride nanowires, which are grown along [110] direction. The electronic structure and wave functions were calculated by solving the self-consistent system of the Schrodinger and Poisson equations by means of both the Thomas-Fermi approximation and the spectral element method. The thermoelectric parameters were determined using a constant relaxation-time approximation. The external electric field can increase the Seebeck coefficient of a nanowire with 7 - 15 nm lateral dimensions by nearly a factor of two, and enhance the figure of merit by an order of magnitude.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Venkatasubramanian, R., Siivola, E., Colpitts, T., and O'Quinn, B., Nature 413, 597 (2001)Google Scholar
2 Zhou, J., Jin, C., Seol, J. H., Li, X., and Shi, L., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 133109 (2005).Google Scholar
3 Li, L., Yang, Y., Huang, X., Li, G., and Zhang, L., Nanotechnology 17, 1706 (2006).Google Scholar
4 Butenko, A. V., Sandomirsky, V., Schlesinger, Y., and Dm. Shvarts, J. Appl. Phys. 82, 12661273 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Sandomirsky, V., Butenko, A. V., Levin, R., and Schlesinger, Y., J. Appl. Phys. 90, 2370 (2001).10.1063/1.1389074Google Scholar
6 , Boukai, Xu, K., and Heath, J.R., Adv. Mater. 18, 864 (2006).Google Scholar
7 Bejenari, I., Kantser, V., Phys. Rev. B 78, 115322 (2008).10.1103/PhysRevB.78.115322Google Scholar
8 Zubkov, V. I., Fiz. Tekh. Poluprovodn. 40, 1236 (2006) [Sov. Phys. Semicond. 40, 1204 (2006)].Google Scholar
9 Luscombe, J. H., Bouchard, A. M., and Luban, M., Phys. Rev. B 46, 10262 (1992).10.1103/PhysRevB.46.10262Google Scholar
10 Ridley, B. K., Quantum Processes in Semiconductors, 3rd ed. (Oxford Univ. Press Inc., New York, 1993) p. 378.Google Scholar
11 Cheng, C., Liu, Q. H., Lee, J.-H., and Massoud, H. Z., J. Comput. Electron. 3, 417 (2004).Google Scholar