Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7tmb6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-30T10:41:56.476Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Energetic Ion Beams in Semiconductor Processing: Summary of a Doe Panel Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

S. T. Picraux ,
E. Chason ,
J. M. Poate ,
J. O. Borland ,
M. I. Current ,
T. Diaz De La Rubia ,
D. J. Eaglesham ,
O. W. Holland ,
M. E. Law  and
C. W. Magee
...Show all authors
S. T. Picraux
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM;
E. Chason
Affiliation:
Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM;
J. M. Poate
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ;
J. O. Borland
Affiliation:
Genus Corporation, Newburyport, MA;
M. I. Current
Affiliation:
Applied Materials, Austin, TX;
T. Diaz De La Rubia
Affiliation:
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, CA;
D. J. Eaglesham
Affiliation:
AT&T Bell Laboratories, Murray Hill, NJ;
O. W. Holland
Affiliation:
Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN;
M. E. Law
Affiliation:
University of Florida, Gainesville, FL;
C. W. Magee
Affiliation:
Evans East, Plainsboro, NJ;
J. W. Mayer
Affiliation:
Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ;
J. Melngailis
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park, MD;
A. F. Tasch
Affiliation:
University of Texas, Austin, TX.
Get access

Abstract

The trend toward smaller dimensions in integrated circuit technology presents severe physical and engineering challenges for ion implantation. These challenges, together with the need for physically-based models at exceedingly small dimensions, are leading to a new level of understanding of fundamental defect science in silicon. Recently the DOE Council on Materials requested that our panel examine the current status and future research opportunities in the area of ion beams in semiconductor processing. Particularly interesting are the emerging approaches to defect and dopant distribution modeling, transient enhanced diffusion, high energy implantation and defect accumulation, and metal impurity gettering. These topics were explored both from the perspective of the emerging science issues and the technology challenges.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 396: Symposium A – Ion-Solid Interactions for Materials Modification and Processing , 1995 , 859
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

1 The National Technology Roadmap for Semiconductors, (Semiconductor Industry Association, San Jose, 1994).Google Scholar
2 The Panel, consisting of the authors of this manuscript, met in a Workshop format in Santa Fe, NM on May 4–7, 1995 to evaluate the status of the field and to assess critical opportunities and future challenges. The Panel was chaired by Picraux, S. T. and Poate, J. M.. A full report of the Panel is being coordinated by E. Chason and will appear in J. Appl. Phys. Reviews.Google Scholar
3 Tasch, A.F., Yang, S.H. and Morris, S.J., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B102, 173 (1995).Google Scholar
4 Caturla, M.J., Diaz de la Rubia, T. and Gilmer, G.H., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B106, 1 (1995).Google Scholar
5 Jaraiz, M., Gilmer, G.H., Poate, J.M. and Diaz de la Rubia, T., App. Phys. Lett. 68, 409 (1996).Google Scholar
6 Fahey, P.M., Griffin, P.B. and Plummer, J.D., Rev. Mod. Phys. 61, 289 (1989).Google Scholar
7 Eaglesham, D.J., Stolk, P.A., Gossman, H.-J., Haynes, T.E. and Poate, J.M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B106, 191 (1995).Google Scholar
8 Tsukamoto, K., Kumori, S., Kuroi, T. and Akasaka, Y., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B59, 584 (1991).Google Scholar
9 Zhou, D.S., Holland, O.W. and Budai, J.D., Appl. Phys. Lett. 63, 3580 (1993).Google Scholar
10 Myers, S.M., D.M. Follstaedt, , Petersen, G.A., Seager, C.H., Stein, H.J. and Wampler, W.R., Nuclear Instrum. and Meth. B106, 379 (1995).Google Scholar
11 Magee, C.W. and Honig, R.E., Surface and Interface Analysis 4, 36 (1982).Google Scholar
12 Knapp, J.A., Banks, J.C. and Doyle, B.L., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B85, 120 (1994).Google Scholar
13 Current, M.I., Mathur, R., Kump, M. and Larson, L.A., Nucl. Instrum. and Meth. B102, 198, (1995).Google Scholar