Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T21:50:40.975Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Electronic Properties of ζ-U-Pu Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Ladislav Havela ,
Anna Adamska ,
Rachel Eloirdi ,
Eric Colineau ,
Jean-Christophe Griveau ,
Thomas Gouder ,
Frank Huber ,
Daniel Bouexière  and
Alexander Shick
Ladislav Havela
Affiliation:
[email protected], Charles University, Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Prague 2, Czech Republic
Anna Adamska
Affiliation:
[email protected], Charles University, Department of Condensed Matter Physics, Prague 2, Czech Republic
Rachel Eloirdi
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Eric Colineau
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Jean-Christophe Griveau
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Thomas Gouder
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Frank Huber
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Daniel Bouexière
Affiliation:
[email protected], European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Transuranium Elements, Karlsruhe, Germany
Alexander Shick
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institute of Physics, ASCR, Na Slovance 2, Praha, 18221, Czech Republic
Get access

Abstract

The ζ-phase, existing between 35 and 70% U in Pu, belongs to the high density phases seen from the point of view of systematics of allotropic modifications of Pu metal. Despite the volume per actinide atom only slightly higher than for α-Pu, it magnetic susceptibility is much higher than for α-Pu and exceeds even the δ-Pu value. Similarly, the Sommerfeld coefficient γ > 40 mJ/mol Pu K2 exceeds the experimental δ-Pu value. The data confirm that the volume is not the primary control parameter affecting the situation around the Fermi level of common Pu phases and they point against the traditional belief that they are essentially narrow 5f band systems.

Keywords

actinidephotoemissionmagnetic properties
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1264: Symposia Z/BB – Basic Actinide Science and Materials for Nuclear Applications , 2010 , 1264-Z09-01
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Ellinger, F.H. Elliott, R.O. and Cramer, E.M. J. Nucl. Mater. 3, 233 (1959).Google Scholar
2 Lawson, A.C. Goldstone, J.A. Cort, B. Martiney, R.J. Vigil, F.A. Zocco, T.G. Richardson, J.W., and Mueller, M.H. Acta Cryst. B52, 32 (1996).Google Scholar
3 Havela, L. Shick, A. and Gouder, T. J. Appl. Phys. 105, 07E130 (2009).Google Scholar
4 King, E. and Lee, J.A. Cryogenics 3, 177 (1963).Google Scholar
5 Bachman, R. DiSalvo, F.J. Jr. , Geballe, T.D. Greene, R.L. Howard, R.E. and King, C.N. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 43, 205 (1972).Google Scholar
6 The values of Pauli paramagnetic susceptibilities taken from The Chemistry of the Actinide and Transactinide Elements, Morss, L.R. Edelstein, N. M. Fuger, J. eds, Springer 2006.10.1007/1-4020-3598-5Google Scholar
7 Meot-Reymond, S. and Fournier, J.M. J. Alloys Comp. 232, 119 (1996).Google Scholar
8 Javorsky, P., Havela, L. Wastin, F. Colineau, E. and Bouëxière, D., Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 156404 (2006).Google Scholar
9 Lashley, J.C. Singleton, J. Migliori, A. Betts, J.B. Fisher, R.A. Smith, J.L. and McQueeney, R.J., Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 205901 (2003).Google Scholar
10 Lashley, J.C. Lang, B.E. Boerio-Goates, J., Woodfield, B.F. Schmideshoff, G.M. Gay, E.F., McPheeters, C.C. Thoma, D.J. Hults, W.L. Cooley, J.C. Hanrahan, R.J. Jr. , and Smith, J.L., Phys. Rev. B63, 224510 (2001).Google Scholar
11 Havela, L. Gouder, T. Wastin, F. and Rebizant, J. Phys. Rev. B65, 235118 (2002).Google Scholar
12 Havela, L. Shick, A. and Gouder, T. J. Nucl. Mater. 285, 28 (2009).Google Scholar
13 Shick, A.B. Drchal, V. and Havela, L. Europhys. Lett. 69, 588 (2005).Google Scholar
14 Tobin, J.G. Soderlind, P. Landa, A. Moore, K.T. Schwartz, A.J. Chung, B.W. Wall, M.A., Wills, J.M. Haire, R.G. and Kutepov, A.L. J.Phys.: Condens. Matter 20, 125204 (2008).Google Scholar