Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:48:16.895Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Electron-Backscatter Diffraction of Photovoltaic Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Helio Moutinho
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Measurements & Characterization, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO, 80401, United States, 303-384-6457, 303-384-6600
Ramesh Dhere
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Measurements & Characterization, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Chun-Sheng Jiang
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Measurements & Characterization, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Bobby To
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Measurements & Characterization, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Mowafak Al-Jassim
Affiliation:
[email protected], National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Measurements & Characterization, 1617 Cole Blvd, Golden, CO, 80401, United States
Get access

Abstract

In electron-backscatter diffraction, crystalline orientation maps are formed while the electron beam of an SEM scans the sample surface. EBSD requires a flat sample to avoid shadowing of the electrons from the detector by surface features. In this work, we investigate the preparation of CdTe samples deposited by close-spaced sublimation for EBSD analysis. Untreated samples were rough, resulting in areas with no EBSD signal. We processed the samples by polishing and ion-beam milling. Polishing produced flat samples, but low-quality EBDS data, because the top surface of the samples had poor crystallinity. In contrast, ion-beam milling proved to be suitable for producing flat samples with minimal surface damage, yielding good EBSD data. We also analyzed the samples with atomic force microscopy, and correlated the quality of the EBSD data with sample roughness. The EBSD data showed that the CdTe films were randomly oriented and had columnar growth and a high density of <111> twin boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Dingley, D. J. and Randle, V., J. Mater. Sci. 27, 4545 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Dingley, D. J. and Field, D. P., Mater. Sci. Technol. 13, 69 (1997).Google Scholar
3. Baba-Kishi, K. Z. and Dingley, D. J., Scanning 11, 305 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Randle, V. and Engler, O., Introduction to Texture Analysis, Macrotexture, Microtexture & Orientation Mapping (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2000) p. 157.Google Scholar
5. Moutinho, H. R., Dhere, R. G., Jiang, C.-S., Al-Jassim, M. M., and Kazmerski, L. L., Thin Solid Films 514, 150 (2006).Google Scholar
6. Danaher, W. J., Lyons, L. E., Marychurch, M., and Morris, G. C., Appl. Surf. Sci. 27, 338 (1986).Google Scholar
7. Niles, D. W., Li, X., and Sheldon, P., J. Appl. Phys. 77, 4489 (1995).Google Scholar
8. Dhere, R. G., Al-Jassim, M. M., Yan, Y., Jones, K. M., Moutinho, H. R., Gessert, T. A., Sheldon, P., and Kazmerski, L. L., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 18, 1604 (2000).Google Scholar