Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T06:55:50.248Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Electromigration of CVD-Copper and PVD-Copper Polycrystalline Lines

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Seok Kim
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea120-749
Doo-Jin Choi
Affiliation:
Dept. of Ceramic Engr., Yonsei Univ., Seoul, Korea120-749
Get access

Abstract

The electromigration characteristics of CVD-Cu films were compared to those of PVDCu films. The CVD-Cu films were deposited using metal-organic precursor of (hfac)Cu(VTMS) and the PVD-Cu films were deposited by evaporation of a 99.995 % Cu metal on TiN and SiO2 substrates. To test EM-resistance, Cu film was patterned into the test structure of multi-lines with 20∼30 µm width and 2500 µm length per one line by a photolithography technique. These test lines had polycrystalline structures composed of much smaller grains than line width and thickness. An accelerated EM test was carried out in the vacuum of 10−6 Torr because the test in N2 ambient had lead to a resistance increase mainly due to oxidation of Cu.

The CVD-Cu lines had shorter lifetime than PVD-Cu and the activation energy of electromigration was 0.754 eV for the CVD-Cu on SiO2, which means the grain boundary diffusion as the EM failure mechanism. The CVD-Cu films had larger grains and poorer continuity between grains than the PVD-Cu films so the resistivity of CVD-Cu films (3.20±0.21 µΩcm) was higher than that of PVD-Cu films (2.00±0.06 µΩcm) having a value of near bulk resistivity. The higher resistivity induces the higher driving force of EM. Moreover the PVD-Cu films had a huge domain structure, which might act as a larger grain than CVD-Cu grain to result in the longer life-time and the surface diffusion mechanism with the activation energy of 0.244 eV.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Lloyd, J. R. and Clement, J. J., Thin Solid Films, 262, p. 135 (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(94)05806-7Google Scholar
2. Lee, K. L., Hu, C. K. and Tu, K. N., J. Appl. Phys., 78 (7), p.4428 (1995).10.1063/1.359851Google Scholar
3. Vook, R. W., Thin Solid Films, 305, p.286 (1997).10.1016/S0040-6090(97)00161-2Google Scholar
4. Kang, H. -K., Cho, J. S. H., Asano, I. and Wong, S. S., Proc IEEE VMIC Conf IEEE, New York, 1992, p.337.Google Scholar
5. Yamada, H., Hoshi, T., Takewaki, T., Shibata, T., Ohmi, T. and Nittam, T., Int. Electron Devices Meet.. Tech. Dig., 1993, p.269.Google Scholar
6. Jo, B. H. and Vook, R. W., Thin Solid Films, 262, p.129 (1995).10.1016/0040-6090(95)05843-5Google Scholar
7. Ohring, M., The Materials Science of Thin Films, Academic Press Inc., San Diego, 1992, pp.454.Google Scholar
8. Black, J. R., Prc. 6th Ann. Intl. Reliab. Phys. Symp., 1967, p. 148 Google Scholar
9. Sze, S. M., VLSI Technology 2nd Ed, Mcgraw-Hill, New York, 1988, pp.634.Google Scholar
10. Vaidya, S. and Sinha, A. K., Thin Solid Films, 75, p.253 (1981).10.1016/0040-6090(81)90404-1Google Scholar
11. Knorr, D. B., Tracy, D. P. and Rodbell, K. P, Appl. Phys. Let., 59 (2), p.3241 (1991).10.1063/1.105745Google Scholar