Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:43:42.528Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of the Orientation of Clay Particles and Ionic Strength on Diffusion and Activation Enthalpies of Iand Cs+ Ions in Compacted Bentonite

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 March 2011

Haruo Sato*
Affiliation:
Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute (JNC), 4-33 Muramatsu, Tokai-mura, Naka-gun, Ibaraki-ken, 319-1194, JAPAN
Get access

Abstract

Apparent diffusivities (Da) for I and Cs+ in compacted Na-smectite were studied as a function of smectite's dry density (0.9–1.4 Mg/m3, ionic strength (IS: [NaCl]=0.01, 0.51 M), temperature (22–60 °C) and diffusion directionto the orientated direction of smectite particles. The Da-values for both ions in parallel direction to the orientated direction showed a tendency to be higher than those in the perpendicular direction at lowIS. The Da-values for I showed different trends depending on diffusion direction and dry density at high IS, but Da-values for Cs+ increased with increasing IS in both diffusion directions. The activation enthalpies (ΔEa) for I, slightly higher than that of diffusivity in free water (Do) at low IS, similar level to that of Do at high IS, increased with increasing dry density. While, ΔEa-values for Cs+, clearly higher than that of Do for all conditions, increased with increasing dry density. Since it is known that interlayer distance depends on both dry density and IS, diffusive pathway is considered to differ depending on the charge of diffusion species.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2004

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Sato, H., Ashida, T., Kohara, Y., Yui, M., and Sasaki, N., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 29(9), 873 (1992).Google Scholar
2. Sato, H., WM'02 Conference Proceedings, Feb. 24-28, 2002, Tucson, AZ, USA, 1-15 (2002).Google Scholar
3. Sato, H. and Suzuki, S., Preprints for Specialist Workshop on Clay Microstructure and Its Importance to Soil Behaviour, Oct. 15-17, 2002, Lund, Sweden, 101-110 (2002).Google Scholar
4. Sato, H. and Suzuki, S., Applied Clay Sci. 23, 51 (2003).Google Scholar
5. Suzuki, S., Sato, H., Ishidera, T., and Fujii, N., J.Contam. Hydrol. 68, 23 (2004).Google Scholar
6. Kozaki, T., Doctoral Thesis, Hokkaido University (1999).Google Scholar
7. Kozaki, T., Sato, H., Fujishima, A., Sato, S., and Ohashi, H., J. Nucl. Sci. Technol. 33(6), 522 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Kozaki, T., Sato, H., Fujishima, A., Sato, S., and Ohashi, H., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XIX, edited by Gray, W. J. and Triay, I. R., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 465, Pittsburgh, PA, 1997), pp.893-900.Google Scholar
9. Kozaki, T., Saito, N., Fujishima, A., Sato, S., and Ohashi, H., J. Contam. Hydrol. 35, 67 (1998).Google Scholar
10. Liu, J., Yamada, N., Kozaki, T., Sato, S. and Ohashi, H., J. Contam. Hydrol. 61, 85 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Crank, J., The Mathematics of Diffusion, 2nd ed. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1975).Google Scholar
12.Japan Nuclear Cycle Development Institute, JNC Tech. Rep., JNC TN1410 2000-004 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Sato, H., Ashida, T., Kohara, Y., and Yui, M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XV, edited by Interrante, C. G. andPabalan, R. T., (Mater. Res. Soc. Proc. 294, Pittsburgh, PA, 1993), pp.430-408.Google Scholar