Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:01:20.042Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Rheological Characteristics of Sol on Preferential Orientation of Pb(Mg,Zn)1/3Nb2/3O3 Thin Films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 February 2011

Hyun M. Jang  and
Mun K. Cho
Hyun M. Jang
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Advanced Ceramics Processing Science Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790–784, Republic of Korea
Mun K. Cho
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, and Advanced Ceramics Processing Science Laboratory, Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH), Pohang 790–784, Republic of Korea
Get access

Abstract

Thin films of Pb(Mg,Zn)1/3Nb2/3O3 were fabricated by spin casting the Pb-Mg-Zn-Nb-0 complex alkoxide sols on (111)Pt-coated MgO (100) planes. It was observed that the rheological characteristics of sol greatly influenced the orientation of perovskite grains after thin-film formation. A strong preferential orientation of (100)-type planes of the perovskite grains was obtained in the thin films derived from the sols exhibiting pseudoplastic behavior. Small angle X-ray scattering experiment in the Porod region was performed to correlate the observed preferential orientation with the network structure of precursors at various stages of aging. It was shown that weakly branched precursor chains led to highly oriented grains after thin-film formation.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 361: Symposium I2 – Ferroelectric Thin Films IV , 1994 , 403
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Cross, L.E., Ferroelectrics, 76, 241 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Harmer, M.P., Chen, J., Peng, P., Chan, H.M., and Smyth, D.M., Ferroelectrics, 97, 263 (1989).Google Scholar
3. Okuwada, K., Imai, M., and Kakuno, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 28 [7] L1271 (1989).Google Scholar
4. Okuwada, K., Nakamura, S., Imai, M., and Kakuno, K., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys., 29 [6] 1153 (1990).Google Scholar
5. Francis, L.F., Oh, Y.J., and Payne, D.A., J. Mater. Sci., 25, 5007 (1990).Google Scholar
6. Francis, L.F. and Payne, D.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 74 [12] 3000 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Whatmore, R.W., Osbond, P.C., and Shorrocks, N.M., Ferroelectrics, 76, 351 (1987).Google Scholar
8. Jang, H.M., Oh, S.H., and Moon, J.H., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 75 [1] 82 (1992).Google Scholar
9. Hench, L.L., Orcel, G., and Nogues, J.L., pp. 35–47 in Better Ceramics Through Chemistry II. Ed. by Brinker, C.J., Ulrich, D.R., and Clark, D.E.. Mater. Res. Soc, Pittsburgh, PA, 1986.Google Scholar
10. Brinker, C.J. and Scherer, G.W., Sol-Gel Science; The Physics and Chemistry of Sol-Gel Processing (Academic Press, 1990), Chapter 3.Google Scholar
11. Sacks, M.D. and Sheu, R.-S., J. Non-Cryst. Solids, 92, 383 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Schaefer, D.W., Martin, J.E., and Keefer, K.D., p. 31 in Physics of Finely Divided Matter. Edited by Bocarra, N. and Daoud, M.. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1985.Google Scholar
13. Kushida, K., Udayakumar, K.R., Krupanidhi, S.B., and Cross, L.E., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 76 [5] 1345 (1993).Google Scholar
14. Brinker, C.J., Hurd, A.J., and Ward, K.J., Chap. 15 in Ultrastructure Processing of Advanced Ceramics. Edited by Mackenzie, J.D. and Ulrich, D.R.. Wiley-Interscl., New York, 1988.Google Scholar
15. Chen, C., Ryder, D.F. Jr and Spurgeon, W.A., J. Am. Ceram. Soc, 72 [8] 1495 (1989).Google Scholar