Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T22:51:48.274Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Plasma Surface Treatment on the Self-forming Barrier Process in Porous SiOCH

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Junichi Koike
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Dept. of Materials Science, 6-6-11 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan, +81-22-795-7360, +81-22-795-7360
Junichi Koike
Affiliation:
[email protected], Tohoku University, Dept. of Materials Science, 6-6-11 Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8579, Japan,
Zsolt Tökei
Affiliation:
[email protected], IMEC, Kapeldreef 75, B-3001 Leuven, Belgium
Get access

Abstract

Self-forming barrier process was carried out on a porous low-k material with the Cu-Mn alloys. The effects of various surface treatments were investigated in the sample having a pore size of 0.9 nm and a porosity of 25%. Before and after annealing, samples were analyzed in cross section with transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and energy dispersive x-ray spectroscopy (EDS). Concentration profile was also analyzed with time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectroscopy (ToF-SIMS). The results indicated the penetration of Cu into the low-k interior during deposition, followed by the segregation of Cu at the low-k/Si interface during subsequent annealing. Although a diffusion barrier layer was formed and no further Cu penetration was not observed during annealing, initial Cu penetration in the deposition process was detrimental and should be prevented by restoring the plasma damage on the low-k surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lau, W. S., Tan, H. J., Chen, Z., Li, C. Y., Vacuum 81, 1040 (2007).Google Scholar
2. Shamiryan, D., Abell, T., Iacopi, F. and Maex, K., Mater. Today, Jan. 35 (2004).Google Scholar
3. Usui, T. and Shibata, H., Nikkei Microdevices 254, 79 (2006).Google Scholar
4. Koike, J., Wada, M., Appl. Phys. Lett. 87, 041911 (2005).Google Scholar
5. Haneda, M., Iijima, J. and Koike, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 252107 (2007).Google Scholar
6. Koike, J. et al, J. Appl. Phys. 102, 043527 (2007).Google Scholar
7. Urbanowicz, A.M., Baklanov, M.R., Heilen, J., Travaly, Y., Cockburn, A., Electrochemical and Solid-State Lett. 10(10), G76–G79 (2007).Google Scholar
8. Travaly, Y., Eyckens, B., Carbonel, L. et al, Microelec. Eng. 64, 367 (2002).Google Scholar
9. Puyrenier, W., Rouessac, V., Broussous, L., Rebiscoul, D., Ayral, A., Microporous & Mesoporous Mater. 106, 40 (2007).Google Scholar