Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T15:37:12.858Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effects of Microstructures on Normal and Early Failures of Interconnects Caused by Electromigration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

Yongkun Liu
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631-0907, [email protected]
R. J. Diefendorf
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Program, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29631-0907, [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Microstructure plays a key role in reliability of interconnects. However, a quantitative correlation between microstructure and reliability of interconnects is lacking. This paper develops a statistical description of effective diffusivity of interconnects by considering grain boundaries, bulk lattice and line interface diffusion, and introduces a microstructure-based electromigration lifetime prediction model for normal failures of interconnects. Further, the probability of early failure of interconnects due to a severe microstructural inhomogeneity is calculated. Using the sub-population failure model, the mean time to failure of interconnects, with a range of microstructures from polycrystalline to hyper-bamboo, are simulated. The reported increase in lifetimes of wide polycrystalline lines with increasing w/d is mainly ascribed to reservoir effects of bonding pads in test structures. Reported lifetime prediction model may be used as guidance for circuit design and accelerated testing.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Referecnces

1. Attardo, M. J. and Rosenberg, R., J. Appl. Phys. 41, 2381(1970).10.1063/1.1659233Google Scholar
2. Cho, J. and Thompson, C. V., Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2577(1989).10.1063/1.101054Google Scholar
3. Joo, Young-chang and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 76, 7339(1995).10.1063/1.357979Google Scholar
4. Dreyer, M. L., Fu, K-Y, and Varker, C. J., J. Appl. Phys. 73, 4849(1993).10.1063/1.353807Google Scholar
5. Black, J. R., Proc. 16t' Ann. Intl. Reliab. Phys. Symp., 233(1978).Google Scholar
6. Korhonen, M. A., Borgesen, P., Brown, D. D., and Li, Che-Yu, J. Appl. Phys. 74, 4995(1993).10.1063/1.354305Google Scholar
7. Liu, Yongkun, Diefendorf, R. J., J. Appl. Phys. 83, 3600(1998).10.1063/1.366577Google Scholar
8. Liu, Yongkun, Cox, C., and Diefendorf, R. J., J. Appl. Phys. (In Press).Google Scholar
9. Knowlton, D., Clement, J. J., and Thompson, C. V., J. Appl. Phys. 81, 6073(1997).10.1063/1.364446Google Scholar
10. Mann, N. R., Schaffer, R. F. and Singpurwalla, N. D., “Methods for statistical analysis of reliability and life data”, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1978.Google Scholar
11. Campbell, A. N., Mijawa, R. E., and Knorr, D. B., J. Electron. Mater. 22, 589(1993).10.1007/BF02666403Google Scholar