Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:43:36.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of In-Plane π’ Bonding on Electronic Transition Energies for Inorganic Polymers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Kim F. Ferris
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Materials and Chemical Sciences Center, Richland, WA.
Steven M. Risser
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Materials and Chemical Sciences Center, Richland, WA.
Angela K. Hanson
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Materials and Chemical Sciences Center, Richland, WA.
Get access

Abstract

The electronic structure of organic and inorganic polymeric systems are well described in terms of their molecular symmetry, even with the large bond polarity shown by such systems as polyphosphazenes. We have performed calculations using the semi-empirical CNDO/1 method to determine the valence electronic structure for a series of model phosphonitrilic and organic compounds. The optical transition energies for phosphonitrilic compounds are greater than their organic counterparts as a result of in-plane π’ bonding interactions. The extent of these interactions is modulated by the electronegativity of the substituent groups on the phosphorus atoms. We report values for the vertical ionization energy and electronic absorption wavelengths, and use molecular orbital contour analysis to show the effects of ligand electronegativity on the π’ network.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Allcock, H.R. in “Phosphorus-Nitrogen CompoundsNew York: Academic Press (1972).Google Scholar
[2] Risser, S.M. and Ferris, K.F., Laser Induced Damage in Optical Materials: 1989, NBS Spec. Publ., (submitted).Google Scholar
[3] Ferris, K.F., Friedman, P., and Friedrich, D.M., Int. J. Quant. Chem. S22, 207, (1988)Google Scholar
Ferris, K.F. and Duke, C.B., Int. J. Quant. Chem. S23, (1989) in press.Google Scholar
[4] Jorgensen, W.L., QCPE Program No. 340, (1970).Google Scholar
[5] Duke, C.B., Salaneck, W.R., Fabish, T.J., Ritsko, J.J., Thomas, H.R., and Paton, A., Phys. Rev. B 18, 5717, (1978).Google Scholar
[6] Malaga, N. and Nishimoto, K., Z. Phys. Chem. 13, 140, (1957).Google Scholar
[7] Pople, J.A. and Segal, G.A., J. Chem. Phys. 43, 5136, (1965).Google Scholar
[8] Lipari, N.O. and Duke, C.B., J. Chem. Phys. 63, 1748, (1975)Google Scholar
Duke, C.B., Yip, K.L., Ceasar, G.P., Potts, A.W., and Streets, D.G., J. Chem. Phys. 66, 256, (1977).Google Scholar
[9] Batich, C., Hielbronner, E., Hornung, V., Ashe, A.J., Clark, D.T., Cobley, U.T., Kilcast, D., and Scanlan, I., J. Amer. Chem. Soc. 95, 928, (1973).Google Scholar
[10] Physical Constants of Organic Compounds in “CRC Handbook of Chemistry and Physics”, 52nd Edition, Cleveland, OH: Chemical Rubber Co., (1970).Google Scholar
[11] Innes, K.K., Bryne, J.P., and Ross, I.G., J. Mol. Spectr. 22, 125, (1967).Google Scholar
[12] Ridley, J. and Zerner, M., Theoret. Chim. Acta 32, 119, (1973).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
[13] Gleiter, R., Heilbronner, E., and Hornung, V., Helv. Chim. Acta 55, 255, (1972).Google Scholar
[14] Branton, G.R., Brion, C.E., Frost, D.C., Mitchell, K.A.R., and Paddock, N.L., J. Chem. Soc. A, 151, (1970).Google Scholar
[15] Lakatos, B., Hesz, A., Vetessy, Z., and Horvath, G., Acta Chim. Acad. Sci. Hung. 60, 309, (1969).Google Scholar