Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T18:46:17.927Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effects of Gas Dilution on the Growth and Properties of Glow Discharge a-Ge:H

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

J. H. Chen
Affiliation:
Boston College Dept. of Physics, Chestnut Hill, MA 02167
P. Wickboldt
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
D. Pang
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
A. E. Wetsel
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
W. Paul
Affiliation:
Division of Applied Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138
Get access

Abstract

We compare films of a-Ge:H deposited by plasma enhanced chemical vapor deposition (PECVD) using GeFLi diluted with H2, He and Ar. The nominal deposition conditions used were those which have produced high quality a-Ge:H with H2 dilution. Using H2 and He as diluents, three studies were done in which the parameters of substrate temperature, diluent gas flow and electrode gap spacing were independently varied. The photoelectronic properties of the films made with He dilution were quite good, although never better than those made with H2 dilution. The overall results indicated that for our nominal conditions hydrogen plays an important and crucial role in producing high quality films, and we believe that this role is mainly to reduce the probability of germane radical incorporation. In contrast to He and H2 dilution, dilution with Ar produced films with much poorer microstructure and a photoresponse two orders of magnitude lower. We attribute this to polymerization of the germane radicals which led to observed dust particles and a reduction in ion bombardment of the growing film.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. See for example: Knights, J.C., Lujan, R.A., Rosenblum, M.P., Street, R.A., Bieglesen, D.K. and Reimer, J.A., Appl. Phys. Lett. 38(5), 331 (1981).Google Scholar
2. Meaudre, R., Meaudre, M., Roca i Cabarrocas, P., Tanidi, S., Bouizem, Y. and Theye, M. L., J. NonCryst. Sol. 137&138, 171 (1991).Google Scholar
3. Roca i Cabarrocas, P., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 142, 33, (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Tsuo, Y.S., Xu, Y., Ramsay, E. A., Crandall, R.S., Salamon, S.J., Balberg, I., Nelson, B.P., Xiao, Y. and Chen, Y., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 219, 769, (1991).Google Scholar
5. Paul, W., Jones, S. J., Marques, F. C., Pang, D., Turner, W. A., Wetsel, A. E., Wickboldt, P. and Chen, J. H., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 212, 211 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Wickboldt, P., Jones, S. J., Marques, F. C., Pang, D., Turner, W. A., Wetsel, A. E., Paul, W. and Chen, J. H., Phil. Mag. B64, (6), 655 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Ritter, D., Zeldov, E. and Weiser, K., Phys. Rev. B38, 8296 (1988)Google Scholar
8. Turner, W. A., Jones, S. J., Lee, C., Lee, S. M., Li, Y. M. and Paul, W., Mater. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 149, 69 (1989).Google Scholar
9. Hundausen, M. and Ley, L., J. NonCryst. Sol. 137&138, 795 (1991)Google Scholar
10. Shirai, H., Nakamura, K., Hanna, J. and Shimizu, I., J. NonCryst. Sol. 137&138, 653 (1991)Google Scholar
11. Kasper, W., Plåttner, R. and Eichmeier, J., J. NonCryst. Sol. 137&138, 799 (1991).CrossRefGoogle Scholar