Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:06:18.192Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Displacing Radiation on Graphite Observed Using in situ Transmission Electron Microscopy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 January 2012

J.A. Hinks ,
A.N. Jones  and
S.E. Donnelly
J.A. Hinks
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy and Materials Analysis Group, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, United Kingdom.
A.N. Jones
Affiliation:
School of Mechanical, Aerospace and Civil Engineering, University of Manchester, United Kingdom.
S.E. Donnelly
Affiliation:
Electron Microscopy and Materials Analysis Group, University of Huddersfield, Queensgate, Huddersfield, HD1 3DH, United Kingdom.
Get access

Abstract

Graphite is used as a moderator and structural component in the United Kingdom’s fleet of Advanced Gas-Cooled Reactors (AGRs) and features in two Generation IV reactor concepts: the Very High Temperature Reactor (VHTR) and the Molten Salt Reactor (MSR). Under the temperature and neutron irradiation conditions of an AGR, nuclear-grade graphite demonstrates significant changes to it mechanical, thermal and electrical properties. These changes include considerable dimensional change with expansion in the c-direction and contraction in the a/b-directions. As the United Kingdom’s AGRs approach their scheduled decommissioning dates, it is essential that this behaviour be understood in order to determine under what reactor conditions their operating lifetimes can be safely extended.

Two models have been proposed for the dimensional change in graphite due to displacing radiation: the “Standard Model” and “Ruck and Tuck”. The Standard Model draws on a conventional model of Frenkel pair production, point defect migration and agglomeration but fails to explain several key experimental observations. The Ruck and Tuck model has been proposed by M.I. Heggie et al. and is based upon the movement of basal dislocation to create folds in the “graphene” sheets and seeks not only to account for the dimension change but also the other phenomena not explained by the Standard Model.

In order to test the validity of these models, work is underway to gather experimental evidence of the microstructural evolution of graphite under displacing radiation. One of the primary techniques for this is transmission electron microscopy with in situ ion irradiation. This paper presents the results of electron irradiation at a range of energies (performed in order to separate the effects of the electron and ion beams) and of combined electron and ion beam irradiation.

Keywords

nuclear materialsradiation effectstransmission electron microscopy (TEM)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1383: Symposium A – Material Challenges in Current and Future Nuclear Technologies , 2012 , mrsf11-1383-a11-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. UK Energy in Brief 2011 (Department for Energy and Climate Change, British Government, 2011) Google Scholar
2. www.edfenergy.com/about-us/energy-generation/nuclear-generation/nuclear-power-stations (Accessed 27/11/11) Google Scholar
3. Official Journal of the European Communities L309 (2001) p1 Google Scholar
4. National Policy Statement for Nuclear Power Generation (Department for Energy and Climate Change, British Government, 2011) Google Scholar
5. Physics of Graphite Kelly, B.T. (Applied Science Publishers Ltd, London 1981)Google Scholar
6. Telling, R.H. Phil Mag 87 (2007) p4797 Google Scholar
7. Heggie, M.I., Suarez-Martinez, I., Davidson, C. and Haffenden, G. J. Nucl. Mater. 413 (2011) p150 Google Scholar
8. Heggie, M.I. and Latham, C.D. Computational Nanoscience (RSC Publishing, London 2011)Google Scholar
9. Bochirol, L. and Bonjour, E. Carbon 6 (1966) p661 Google Scholar
10. Reynolds, W.N. and Thrower, P.A. Phil. Mag. 12 (1965) p573 Google Scholar
11. Hinks, J.A., van den Berg, J.A. and Donnelly, S.E. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 29 (2011) p021003 Google Scholar
12. Ziegler, J. F., Ziegler, M. D. and Biersack, J. P. Nucl. Instr. Meth. B268 (2010) p1818 Google Scholar