Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-26T04:57:09.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of an Applied Magnetic Field on Directional Solidification of Off-Eutectic Bi-Mn Alloys

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

J. L. Decarlo  and
R. G. Pirich
J. L. Decarlo
Affiliation:
Grumman Corporate Research Center, A01-26, Bethpage, NY 11714-3580 U.S.A.
R. G. Pirich
Affiliation:
Grumman Corporate Research Center, A01-26, Bethpage, NY 11714-3580 U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Off-eutectic compositions of Bi-Mn were directionally solidified in applied transverse magnetic fields up to 3 kG to determine the effects odn thermal and solutal convection. For Bi-rich compositions, the magnetic field appeared to increase mixing as determined from thermal, morphological, chemical and magnetic analyses. For Mn-rich compositions morphological and chemical analyses suggest some reduction in mixing due to application of the magnetic field. Conductivity gradients in the melt are suggested as a possible mechanism for the observed results.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 87: Symposium O – Materials Processing in the Reduced Gravity Environment of Space , 1986 , 353
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Flemings, M., Solidification Processing, (McGraw-Hill, New York, 1974).Google Scholar
2. Pirich, R., Larson, D., and Busch, G., IEEE Trans. MAG-15 (6), 1754 (1979).Google Scholar
3. Pirich, R., IEEE Trans. MAG–16 (5), 1065 (1980).Google Scholar
4. DeCarlo, J., and Pirich, R., Grumman Research and Development Center Report RE-680, 1984.Google Scholar
5. DeCarlo, J., and Pirich, R., Met. Trans A 15A, 2155–2161 (1984).Google Scholar
6. Utech, H., and Flemings, M., in Crystal Growth, (Pergamon Press, New York, 1967), p. 651.Google Scholar
7. Kim, K., J. Electrochem Soc. 129 (2), 427 (1982).Google Scholar
8. Burton, J., Prim, R., and Slichter, W., J. Chem. Phys. 21 (11), 1987 (1953).Google Scholar
9. Verhoeven, J., and Homer, R., Met. Trans. 1, 3437 (1970).Google Scholar
10. Pirich, R., Larson, D., Wilcox, W., Fu, T., Ravishankar, P., Remarao, B., Nair, M., and Doddi, K., Grumman Research and Development Center Report RE-649, 1983.Google Scholar
11. Pirich, R., in Materials Processing in the Reduced Gravity Environment of Space, edited by G., Rindone, (Elsevier Science Publishing Co., New York, 1982), p. 593.Google Scholar
12. Fu, T., and Wilcox, W., J. Crys. Growth 51, 557 (1981).Google Scholar
13. Baskaran, V., Eisa, G., and Wilcox, W., in Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements, (Proc. of the 2nd Int. Conf., QE2, 1984), p. 219–230.Google Scholar
14. Jackson, K., and Hunt, J., Trans. AIME 236, 1129 (1966).Google Scholar
15. Okada, T., and Ohno, S., J. Phys. Soc. Japan 55 (2), 599 (1986).Google Scholar
16. Gasser, J., and Kleim, R., in Liquid Metals 1976, edited by Evans, and Greenwood, (The Institute of Physics, London, 1977), p. 352.Google Scholar
17. Mott, N., and Jones, H., The Theory of the Properties of Metals and Alloys, (Dover Publishers, New York, 1958).Google Scholar