Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-25T09:29:09.504Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Yttrium Ion Implantation on the High Temperature Oxidation Properties of NiAl

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

B.A. Pint ,
A. Jain  and
L.W. Hobbs
B.A. Pint
Affiliation:
H.H. Uhlig Corrosion Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
A. Jain
Affiliation:
ITMMEC, Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi 110016, India
L.W. Hobbs
Affiliation:
H.H. Uhlig Corrosion Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139
Get access

Abstract

NiAl was ion implanted with yttrium (2×1016 cm−2) in order to study its effect on the very high temperature (1000–1500°C) oxidation properties. At 1000°C, implanted Y stabilizes the faster growing θ-Al2O3 phase, thus slightly increasing the oxidation rate. At 1200°C, where predominantly α-Al2 O3 is formed with and without Y, there is a factor of 4 reduction in the oxidation rate. However at higher than 1200°C, there is little effect by Y on the oxidation rate. Cyclic testing showed that the Y implant had an imperfect and short-lived improvement on adherence relative to other Y-containing alloys. Variations in aluminum content from 23.5 to 36.0wt%(40–55at%) had little effect on the oxidation properties. Initial experiments at 1500°C with a novel Rh marker indicate that alumina grows at least partially by outward cation diffusion both with and without Y.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 213: Symposium Q – High-Temperature Ordered Intermetallic Alloys IV , 1990 , 981
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Whittle, D.P. and Stringer, J., Phil. Trans. Royal Soc. London, Ser. A 295, 309 (1980).Google Scholar
2. Funkenbush, A.W., Smeggil, J.G., and Bornstein, N.S., Met. Trans., 16A, 1164 (1985).Google Scholar
3. Smialek, J., Met. Trans., 18A, 164 (1987).Google Scholar
4. Przybylski, K., Garratt-Reed, A.J., Yurek, G.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 135, 517 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5. Cotell, C., Yurek, G.J., Hussey, R., Mitchell, D., Graham, M.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134, 2643 (1987).Google Scholar
6. Przybylski, K., Garratt-Reed, A.J., Pint, B.A., Katz, E.P., and Yurek, G.J., J. Electrochem. Soc., 134, 3207 (1987).Google Scholar
7. Hindam, H.M. and Smeltzer, W.W., Oxid. Met., 14, 337 (1980).Google Scholar
8. Huang, T.T., Richter, R., Chang, Y.L., and Pfender, E., Met. Trans., 16A, 2051 (1985).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
9. Reddy, K.P.R., Smialek, J.L., and Cooper, A.R., Oxid. Met., 17, 429 (1982).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10. Quadakkers, W.J., Holzbrecher, H., Briefs, K.G., and Beske, H., Oxid. Met., 31, 67 (1989).Google Scholar
11. Jedlinski, J. and Mrowec, S., Mat. Sci. and Eng., 87, 281 (1987).Google Scholar
12. Mrowec, S., Gil, A., Jedlinski, A., Werk. Korr., 38, 563 (1987).Google Scholar
13. Young, E.W.A. and de Wit, J.H.W., Oxid. Met., 26, 351 (1986).Google Scholar
14. Rybicki, G.C. and Smialek, J.L., Oxid. Met., 31, 275 (1989).Google Scholar