Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T03:24:32.126Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Effect of Waste Package Components on Radionuclides Released from Spent Fuel Under Hydrothermal Conditions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 February 2011

Shirley A. Rawson ,
William L. Neal  and
James R. Burnell
Shirley A. Rawson
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA, 99352
William L. Neal
Affiliation:
Westinghouse Hanford Company, P.O. Box 1970, Richland, WA, 99352
James R. Burnell
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest Laboratory, Richland, WA, 99352
Get access

Abstract

The Basalt Waste Isolation Project has conducted a series of hydrothermal experiments to characterize waste/barrier/rock interactions as a part of its study of the Columbia River basalts as a potential medium for a nuclear waste repository. Hydrothermal tests of 3–15 months duration were performed with light water reactor spent fuel and simulated groundwater, in combination with candidate container materials (low-carbon steel or copper) and/or basalt, in order to evaluate the effect of waste package materials on spent fuel radionuclide release behavior. Solutions were filtered through 400 and 1.8 nm filters to distinguish colloidal from dissolved species. In all experiments, 14C, 129I, and 137Cs occurred only as dissolved species, whereas the actinides occurred in 400 nm filtrates primarily as spent fuel particles. Actinide concentrations in 1.8 nm filtrates were below detection in steel-bearing experiments. In the system spent fuel + copper, apparent time-invariant concentrations of 14C and 137Cs were obtained, but in the spent fuel + steel system, the concentrations of 14C and 137Cs increased gradually throughout the experiments. In experiments containing basalt or steel + basalt, 137Cs concentrations decreased with time. In tests with copper + basalt, 14C and 129I concentrations attained time-invariant values and 137Cs concentrations decreased. Concentrations for the actinides and fission products measured in these experiments were below those calculated from Federal regulations governing radionuclide release.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 112: Symposium P – Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI , 1987 , 453
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. McCall, T.B., and Krogness, J.C., in High Level Nuclear Waste Disposal edited by Burkholder, H. C. (Battelle Press, Battelle Memorial, Columbus, Ohio) pp. 525–531.Google Scholar
2. Salter, P.F., Burnell, J.R., and Lane, D.L., in Advances in Ceramics edited by Clark, D.E., White, W.B., and Machiels, A.J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 1986) pp. 79–89.Google Scholar
3. Bumell, J.R., Myers, J., and Coles, D.G., Geol. Soc. Am. Abs. Prog. 17, 535 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Bumell, J.R., Coles, D.G., and Thomas, L.E., in Advances in Ceramics edited by Clark, D. E., White, W. B., and Machiels, A. J. (The American Ceramic Society, Westerville, Ohio, 1986) pp. 361–371.Google Scholar
5. Uziemblo, N.H., Thomas, L.E., Schoenlein, L.H., Mastel, B. and Jenson, E.D., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management X edited by Bates, J. K. and Seefeldt, W.B. (Elsevier Science Publishers, New York, New York, 1987) pp. 161–17 1.Google Scholar
6. Thomas, L.E., Uziemblo, N.H., Mastel, B., Schoenlein, L.H., and Jenson, E.D., Westinghouse Hanford Company report SD-BWI-TI-360, Rev. 0, 1988.Google Scholar
7. Neal, W.L., Rawson, S.A., and Murphy, W.M., in Scientific Basis for Nuclear Waste Management XI, edited by Apted, M.J. and Westerman, R., this volume (1988).Google Scholar
8. Barner, J.O., Pacific Northwest Laboratory report PNL-5109, Rev. 1, UC-70, 1985.Google Scholar
9. Allen, C.C., Johnston, R.G., and Strope, M.B., Rockwell Hanford Operations report SD-BWI-DP-053, Rev. 0, 1985.Google Scholar
10. Dill, J.A., Jones, T.E., Marcy, A.D., Baechler, M.O., Payne, J.R., Rockwell Hanford Operations report SD-BWI-TD-013, Rev. 0, 1985.Google Scholar
11. Seyfried, W.E. Jr., Gordon, P.C., and Dickson, F.W., Am. Min., 64, 646 (1979).Google Scholar
12. Kom, R., Ulmer, G.C., and Grandstaff, D.E., in Fifth International Symposium on Water-Rock Interaction: Extended Abstracts (Orkustofnun, Reykjavik, Iceland, 1986), p.333–337.Google Scholar
13. Relyea, J.F., and Wood, M.I., Rockwell Hanford Operations report SD-BWI-TI-232, Rev. 0, 1984.Google Scholar