Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:19:04.251Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Surface Contamination on Adhesive Forces as Measured by Contact Mechanics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

John A. Emerson
Affiliation:
Department of Organic Materials, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–0958, USA
Rachel K. Giunta
Affiliation:
Department of Organic Materials, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–0958, USA
Gregory V. Miller
Affiliation:
Department of Organic Materials, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–0958, USA
Christopher R. Sorensen
Affiliation:
Department of Organic Materials, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM 87185–0958, USA
Raymond A. Pearson
Affiliation:
Materials Science and Engineering Department, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015–3195, USA
Get access

Abstract

The contact adhesive forces between two surfaces, one being a soft hemisphere and the other being a hard plate, can readily be determined by applying an external compressive load to mate the two surfaces and subsequently applying a tensile load to peel the surfaces apart. The contact region is assumed the superposition of elastic Hertzian pressure and of the attractive surface forces that act only over the contact area. What are the effects of the degree of surface contamination on adhesive forces? Clean aluminum surfaces were coated with hexadecane as a controlled contaminant. The force required to pull an elastomeric hemisphere from a surface was determined by contact mechanics, via the JKR model, using a model siloxane network for the elastomeric contact sphere. Due to the dispersive nature of the elastomer surface, larger forces were required to pull the sphere from a contaminated surface than a clean aluminum oxide surface.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Lopez, E. P. (private communication) Sandia National Laboratories, 1999.Google Scholar
2. Johnson, K. L., Kendall, K. and Roberts, A. D., Proc. R. Soc. London: Part A, 324, 301 (1971).Google Scholar
3. Hertz, H., Gesammelte Werke, Leipzig, 1895.Google Scholar
4. Emerson, J. A., Miller, G. V., Sorensen, C. R., and Pearson, R. A., ACS Polymeric Materials: Science and Engineering, 81, 385 (1999).Google Scholar