Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:31:16.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of O2/Ni ratio on structure and surface morphology of atmospheric pressure MOCVD grown NiO thin films

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 May 2013

Teuku M. Roffi
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan.
Motohiko Nakamura
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan.
Kazuo Uchida
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan.
Shinji Nozaki
Affiliation:
Department of Engineering Science, The University of Electro-Communications, 1-5-1 Chofugaoka, Chofu, Tokyo 182-8585, Japan.
Get access

Abstract

Effect of oxygen to nickel molar ratio (O2/Ni) on the crystallinity of atmospheric pressure metal organic chemical vapor deposition (APMOCVD) grown NiO at 500°C is reported. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analysis including grazing incident angle θ of 0.6°, θ-2θ, ɸ and rocking curve scan are employed for crystallographic characterization. Furthermore, surface roughness is studied by atomic force microscopy (AFM). No evidence of diffraction peaks in X-ray grazing incident angle measurement confirms that all the grown NiO films are well oriented along a certain direction. θ-2θ scan results further indicate that the samples are highly oriented only along [111] direction on (0001) sapphire substrates. The analysis of full width at half maximum (FWHM) of rocking curve scan of (111) plane shows that higher O2/Ni ratio results in better crystallinity. The best crystallinity is achieved with FWHM as low as 0.106° at (111) rocking curve scan corresponding to 82.57nm grain size. AFM measurement shows that NiO films grown with higher O2/Ni ratio have smoother surface morphology.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ohta, H. et al., Appl. Phys. Lett. 83(5), 1029 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sato, H., Minami, T., Takata, S. and Yamada, T., Thin Solid Films 236(1-2), 2731(1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, H. et al., Vacuum 86(12), 20442047(2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parmigiani, F. and Sangaletti, L., J. Electron. Spectrosc. Relat. Phenom. 98-99, 287302(1999).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, H., Lu, Y., Wu, J. and Hwang, W., Mater. Trans., JIM 46(11), 25302535(2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindahl, E., Lu, J., Ottosson, M. and Carlsson, J., J. Cryst. Growth 311(16), 40824088(2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gupta, P., Dutta, T., Mal, S. and Narayan, J., J. Appl. Phys. 111, 013706(2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mocuta, C. and Barbier, A., J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 211, 283290(2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chou, H. Y. et al., J. Appl. Phys. 110(11), 113724(2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uchida, K. et al., AIP Advances 2(4), 042154(2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar