Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:16:37.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Effect of Hydrogen on the Fatigue Properties of Austenitic Stainless Steel

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2013

Adam L. Nekimken
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
Patrick D. Ferro
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
John A. Sousa
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
Christine K. Ngan
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
Michael D. Phillips
Affiliation:
Mechanical Engineering Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
Chauncy N. Cullitan
Affiliation:
Physics Department, Gonzaga University, 502 E Boone, Spokane WA, 99258
Get access

Abstract

Hydrogen can be used as an environmentally friendly fuel to power vehicles, electric devices, and spacecraft with water vapor as the only emission. One associated challenge is the development of safe hydrogen storage systems. Hydrogen tanks and other hydrogen infrastructure elements will be exposed to both high-pressure hydrogen and cyclic stresses. In our work, 304 stainless steel specimens were precharged with hydrogen and subjected to rotational bending fatigue with a maximum stress amplitude of 90 ksi. A diffusion model was solved to approximate the concentration of hydrogen in the specimen at the time of the test. Contrary to our previous work with simple bending fatigue tests, hydrogen precharging actually increased rotational bending fatigue life from 28,074 (Sx = 7,430, N = 103) cycles to 91,513 (Sx = 40,209, N=32) cycles, a factor of approximately 3.25. This result demonstrates that the effect of hydrogen on fatigue life can be highly situational, and great care should be taken when designing systems that will be exposed to high-pressure hydrogen under fatigue conditions.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Craig, B., ASM Corrosion Handbook 13A, 368380 (2003)Google Scholar
Nelson, H.G. in Treatise on Materials Sci. and Tech., v. 25, (Academic Press, 1983) p. 293294.Google Scholar
Budynas, R.G. and Nisbett, J.K.. Shigley’s Mechanical Engineering Design, 9th ed. (McGraw-Hill, New York, 2011) p. 266267.Google Scholar
Fuchs, H.O. and Stephens, R.I., Metal Fatigue in Engineering, (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1980) p. 31.Google Scholar
Birnbaum, H.K. and Sofronis, P.. Mat. Sci.. and Eng A176, 191202 (1994).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
San Marchi, C., Somerday, B.P., SAE Technical Paper 2007-01-0433, 2007.Google Scholar
Murakami, Y., Kanezaki, T., and Mine, Y., Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 41, 25482562 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferro, P.D., Wallace, J., Nekimken, A.L., Dreyfoos, T., Spilker, T., and Marshall, E., in Advances in Materials Science for Environmental and Energy Technologies: Ceramic Transactions, edited by Ohji, T., Singh, M., Hoffman, E., Seabaugh, M. and Yang, Z. G., (Mat. Sci. & Tech. Symp. Pro., Columbus, OH, 2011) pp. 175185.Google Scholar
Peterson, R.E., Stress Concentration Factors, 1st ed. (John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1974) p. 165.Google Scholar
San Marchi, C., Somerday, B.P., and Robinson, S.L., Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 32, 100116 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Strehlow, R.A. and Savage, H.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 53, 323327 (1974).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crank, J., Mathematics of Diffusion, (Oxford University Press, Glasgow, 1956) p. 5.Google Scholar
Murakami, Y., Kanezaki, T., Mine, Y., and Matsuoka, S., Metall. Mater. Trans. A 39, 13271339 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar