Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T00:30:30.265Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effect of Antiphase Domain Boundaries on Prism Slip in Ti3Al Single Crystals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 February 2011

Y. Koizumi*
Affiliation:
Department of Adaptive Machine Systems, Osaka University, 2–1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
Y. Minamino
Affiliation:
Department of Adaptive Machine Systems, Osaka University, 2–1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
N. Tsuji
Affiliation:
Department of Adaptive Machine Systems, Osaka University, 2–1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
T. Nakano
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Osaka University, 2–1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
Y. Umakoshi
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Osaka University, 2–1 Yamada-oka, Suita, Osaka 565–0871, Japan
*
* Corresponding author. tel&fax: +81–6–6879–7434. E-mail address:[email protected] (Y. Koizumi)
Get access

Abstract

Effect of antiphase domain boundaries (APDBs) on yielding and dislocation structure were investigated in Ti3Al single crystals oriented for prism slip. The yield stress greatly depended on the size of antiphase domains (APDs). The yield stress of Ti3Al with the average APD size of 35nm was about six times higher than that of Ti3Al without APDB. Single dislocations (isolated superpartial dislocations) were observed in the deformed Ti3Al single crystal with APD sizes smaller than 100nm, while superdislocation pairs were observed in those with larger APDs. The mechanism of the interaction between the prism dislocations and APDBs is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Ardley, G. W., Acta Metall. 3, 525 (1955).Google Scholar
2. Morris, D. G., Morris, M. A., Philo. Mag. A 61, 469491 (1990).Google Scholar
3. Blackburn, M. J., Trans. Metall. Soc. AIME, 1200 (1967).Google Scholar
4. Koizumi, Y., Katsumura, H., Minamino, Y., Tsuji, N., Mat. Res. Soc. Symp. Proc. 705, 217222 (2001).Google Scholar
5. Koizumi, Y., Minamino, Y., Nakano, T. and Umakoshi, Y., Proceedings of Defect and Diffusion Forum (DIMAT 2000) 194–199, edited by Limoge, Y. and Bocquet, J. L., (Scitec Publications, Switzerland, 2001) pp. 577582.Google Scholar
6. Minonishi, Y.: Philo. Mag. A 63, 10851093 (1991).Google Scholar
7. Nakano, T., Koizumi, Y., Tsujimoto, T., Umakoshi, Y., Intermetallics 4, 571579 (1996).Google Scholar
8. Nakano, T., Umakoshi, Y.: J. of Alloys Comp. 197, 1720 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Inui, H., Toda, Y., Shirai, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Philo Mag A 69, 11611177 (1994).Google Scholar
10. Inui, H., Toda, Y., Yamaguchi, M., Philo. Mag A 67, 13151332 (1993).Google Scholar
11. Nakano, T., Ogawa, B., Koizumi, Y., Umakoshi, Y., Acta Mat 46, 43114324 (1998).Google Scholar
12. Koizumi, Y., Nakano, T., Umakoshi, Y., Intermetallics 8, 179186 (2000).Google Scholar
13. Legros, M., Couret, A. and Caillard, D., Philo. Mag. A 73, 6180 (1996).Google Scholar