Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:20:20.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Effeci of Stresses on Void Nucleation During Electromigration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 February 2011

F. R. Brotzen
Affiliation:
Rice University, Department of Materials Science, Houston, TX 77251–1892
C. T. Rosenmayer
Affiliation:
IBM, Austin, Tx 78758
C. F. Dunn
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas Tx 75265–655012
J. W. McPherson
Affiliation:
Texas Instruments, Inc., Dallas Tx 75265–655012
Get access

Abstract

Based on experimental findings obtained earlier by the authors [1], a model is devised in which the divergence of the vacancy flow created in the grain boundaries of Al-Si(1%) metallizations by high-density DC is attributed to temperature gradients and structural features. Void nuclei of critical size are created in areas of high vacancy concentration. These nuclei grow, fed by the electromigrational vacancy current. It is shown that stresses have only a negligible' effect on the vacancy diffusion but influence the nucleation process dramatically. Results expressed in terms of fraction of void area are calculated and then correlated with experimental results. Certain material parameters, whose values are not known, are derived from the experimental data. The physical significance of these parameters is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Rosenmayer, C.T., Brotzen, F. R., McPherson, J. W. and Dunn, C. F., IEEE 29th Annual Proc. Reliability Phys., 52 (1991).Google Scholar
2. Yue, J. T., Funsten, W. P. and Taylor, R. V., IEEE 23rd Annual Proc. Reliability Phys., 126(1985).Google Scholar
3. Turner, T. and Wendel, K., IEEE 23rd Annual Proc. Reliability Phys., 76 (1985).Google Scholar
4. Black, J. R., IEEE 5th Annual Proc. Reliability Phys., 147 (1967).Google Scholar
5. Shatzkes, M. and Lloyd, J. R., J. Appl. Phys. 52, 3890 (1986).Google Scholar
6. Schafft, H. A., Grant, T. C., Saxena, A, N. and Kao, C. Y., IEEE 23rd Annual Proc. Reliability Phys., 97 (1985).Google Scholar
7. Sigsbee, R. A., J. Appl. Phys. 44, 2533 (1973).Google Scholar
8. Kirchheim, R. and Kaeber, U., J. Appl. Phys. 70 172 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Kirchheim, R., to appear in Acta Met. et Mat.Google Scholar
10. von Smoluchowski, M., Ann. Physik 48, 1102 (1915).Google Scholar
11. Hummel, R. E. in Electro- and Thermo-Transport in Metals and Alloys, edited by Hummel, R. E. and Huntington, H. B. (TMS-AIME, New York, 1977) pp. 93107.Google Scholar
12. Sorbello, R. S. in Electro- and Thermo-Transport in Metals and Alloys, edited by Hummel, R. E. and Huntington, H. B. (TMS-AIME, New York, 1977) pp. 229.Google Scholar
13. Siegel, R. W. in Properties of Atomic Defects in Metals, edited by Peterson, N. L. and Siegel, R. W. (North-Holland Pub;., Amsterdam, 1978) pp. 117146.Google Scholar
14. Schreiber, H.-U., Solid State Electronics 24, 583 (1981).Google Scholar
15. Riedel, H., Fracture at High Temperatures (Springer Verlag, Berlin, 1987) Ch. 7.Google Scholar
16. Raj, R. and Ashby, M. F, Acta Met. 22, 653 (1975).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17. Burke, J., The Kinetics of Phase Transformation in Metals. (Pergamon Press, Oxford, 1965), Ch. 5.Google Scholar