Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-01T02:49:17.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dynamic Fiber Bundle Model of Biopolymer Deformation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Mark Hyunpong Jhon  and
Daryl Chrzan
Mark Hyunpong Jhon
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials Science, Berkeley, California, United States
Daryl Chrzan
Affiliation:
[email protected], University of California, Berkeley, Department of Materials Science, Berkeley, California, United States
Get access

Abstract

A statistical model is developed to study the loading-rate dependent mechanical response of biopolymer arrays. Using the kinetic Monte Carlo method, bundles of fibers are studied under load-controlled and displacement-controlled conditions.

Keywords

biomaterialsimulationstructural
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1187: Symposium KK – Structure-Property Relationships in Biomineralized and Biomimetic Composites , 2009 , 1187-KK06-02
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Meyers, M. A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A. Y.-M., Seki, Y.. Prog. Mat. Sci. 53, 1–206 (2008).10.1016/j.pmatsci.2007.05.002Google Scholar
2 Currey, J. D. J. Biomechanics 22 (5), 469–475 (1989).10.1016/0021-9290(89)90207-8Google Scholar
3 Menig, R., Meyers, M. H., Meyers, M. A., Vecchio, K. S. Acta Mat. 48, 2383–2398 (2000).10.1016/S1359-6454(99)00443-7Google Scholar
4 Smith, B. L., Schffer, T. E., Viani, M., Thompson, J. B., Frederick, N. A., Kindt, J., Belcher, A., Stucky, G. D., Morse, D. E., Hansma, P. K. Nature 399, 761–763 (1999).10.1038/21607Google Scholar
5 Fantner, G. E., Oroudjev, E., Schitter, G., Golde, L. S., Thurner, P., Finch, M. M., Turner, P., Gutsmann, T., Morse, D. E., Hansma, H., Hansma, P. K. Biophys. J. 90, 1411–1418 (2006).10.1529/biophysj.105.069344Google Scholar
6 Rief, M., Fernandez, J. M., Gaub, H. E. Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (21), 4764–4767 (1997).10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.4764Google Scholar
7 Rief, M., Gautel, M., Oesterhelt, F., Fernandez, J. M., Gaubes, H. E. Science 276, 1109–1112 (1997).10.1126/science.276.5315.1109Google Scholar
8 Qi, H. J., Ortiz, C., Boyce, M. C. J. Eng. Mat. Tech. 128, 509–518 (2006).Google Scholar
9 Jhon, M.H., Chrzan, D.C., J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mat. (2009), doi:10.1016/j.jmbbm.2009.02.002.Google Scholar
10 Marko, J. F., Siggia, E. D. Macromolecules 28, 8759 (1995).10.1021/ma00130a008Google Scholar
11 Jansen, A. P. J. Comp. Phys. Comm. 86, 1–12 (1995).10.1016/0010-4655(94)00155-UGoogle Scholar