Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T14:43:04.325Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domain Switch Toughening in Polycrystalline Ferroelectrics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Chad M. Landis  and
Jianxin Wang
Chad M. Landis
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceRice UniversityMS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005
Jianxin Wang
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials ScienceRice UniversityMS 321, 6100 Main Street, Houston, TX 77005
Get access

Abstract

Mode I steady crack growth is analyzed to determine the toughening due to domain switching in poled ferroelectric ceramics. A multi-axial, electromechanically coupled, incremental constitutive theory is applied to model the material behavior of the ferroelectric ceramic. The constitutive law is then implemented within the finite element method to study steady crack growth. The effects of mechanical and electrical poling on the fracture toughness are investigated. Results for the predicted fracture toughness, remanent strain and remanent polarization distributions, and domain switching zone shapes and sizes are presented. Finally, the model predictions are discussed in comparison to experimental observations.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 881: Symposium CC – Coupled Nonlinear Phenomena Modeling and Simulation for Smart, Ferroic and Multiferroic Materials , 2005 , CC2.7
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Pisarenko, G.G., Chusko, V.M., Kovalev, S.P., Journal of American Ceramic Society 68, 259–267 (1985).Google Scholar
2 Metha, K., Virkar, A.V., Journal of American Ceramic Society 73, 567–573 (1990).Google Scholar
3 Tobin, A.G., Pak, Y.E., Proceedings of SPIE-International Society of Optical Engineering 1916, 78–86 (1993).Google Scholar
4 Wang, H., Singh, R.N., Journal of Applied Physics 81, 7471–7479 (1997).Google Scholar
5 Schneider, G.A., Heyer, V., Journal of the European Ceramic Society 19, 1299–1306 (1999).Google Scholar
6 Lucato, S.L., Lindner, J., Lupascu, D.C., Rödel, J., Key Engineering Materials 206-213, 609–612 (2002).Google Scholar
7 Yang, W., Fang, F., Tao, M., International Journal of Solids and Structures 38, 2203–2211 (2001).Google Scholar
8 Hackemann, S., Pfeiffer, W., Journal of the European Ceramic Society 23, 141–151 (2003).Google Scholar
9 Kamlah, M., Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics 13, 219–268 (2001).Google Scholar
10 Landis, C.M., Current Opinion in Solid State and Materials Science 8, 59–69 (2004).Google Scholar
11 Landis, C.M., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 50, 127–152 (2002).Google Scholar
12 Landis, C.M., Journal of Applied Mechanics 70, 470–478 (2003).Google Scholar
13 Landis, C.M., Wang, J., Sheng, J., Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 15, 513–525 (2004).Google Scholar
14 Huber, J.E., Fleck, N.A., Landis, C.M., McMeeking, R.M., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 47, 1663–1697 (1999).Google Scholar
15 Landis, C.M., Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 51, 1347–1369 (2003).Google Scholar
16 Wang, J., Landis, C.M., Acta Materialia 52, 3435–3446 (2004).Google Scholar
17 Landis, C.M., International Journal of Solids and Structures 41, 695–715 (2004).Google Scholar
18 Hutchinson, J.W., “A course on nonlinear fracture mechanics,” Harvard University Report, DEAP S-8, Division of Aplied Sciences (1974).Google Scholar
19 Landis, C.M., International Journal for numerical methods in engineering 55, 613–628 (2002).Google Scholar
20 Li, F.Z., Shih, C.F., Needleman, A., Engineering Fracture Mechanics 21, 405–421 (1985).Google Scholar
21 Lynch, C.S., Acta Materiallia 44, 4137–4148 (1996).Google Scholar