Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:19:36.253Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Determination of Interfacial Structure and Phase Transitions in Al/Cu and Al/Ni Interfaces by Means of Surface Extended X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

E. V. Barrera
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251
S. M. Heald
Affiliation:
Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Rice University, Houston, TX 77251
Get access

Abstract

Surface extended x-ray absorption fine structure (SEXAFS) was used to investigate the interfacial conditions of Al/Cu and Al/Ni shallow buried interfaces. Previous studies using glancing angle extended x-ray absorption fine structure, x-ray reflectivity, photoemission, and SEXAFS produced conflicting results as to whether or not the interfaces between Al and Cu and Al and Ni were reacted upon room temperature deposition. In this study polycrystalline bilayers of Al/Cu and Al/Ni and trilayers of Al/Cu/Al and Al/Ni/Al were deposited on tantalum foil at room temperature in ultra high vacuum and analyzed to evaluate the reactivity of these systems on a nanometer scale. It became overwhelming apparent that the interfacial phase reactions were a function of the vacuum conditions. Samples deposited with the optimum vacuum conditions showed reaction products upon deposition at room temperature which were characterized by comparisons to standards and by least squares fitting to be CuAl2 and NiAl3 respectively. The results of this study showed that the reacted zone thicknesses were readily dependent on the deposition parameters. For both Al on Cu and Al on Ni as well as the metal on Al conditions 10A reaction zones were observed. These reaction zones were smaller than that observed for bilayers of Al on Cu (30Å) and Al on Ni (60Å) where deposition rates were much higher and samples were much thicker. The reaction species are evident by SEXAFS, where the previous photoemission studies only indicated that changes had occurred. Improved vacuum conditions as compared to the earlier experiments is primarily the reason reactions on deposition were seen in this study as compared to the earlier SEXAFS studies.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Heald, S. M., Chen, H., and Tranquada, J. M., Phys. Rev. B, 38, 1016 (1988).Google Scholar
2. Chen, H. and Heald, S. M., Solid State Ionics, 32/33, 924, (1989).Google Scholar
3. Chen, H. and Heald, S. M., J. Appl. Physics., 66, 1793 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chen, H. and Heald, S. M., Phys. Rev. B, 42, 4913 (1990).Google Scholar
5. DiMarzio, D., Chen, H., Ruckman, M. W., and Heald, S. M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol.^A 7, 1549 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Heald, S. M. and Barrera, E. V., Faraday Discuss. Chem. Soc. 89, 21 (1990).Google Scholar
7. Heald, S. M. and Barrera, E. V., J. Mater. Res., 6, 935 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Heald, S. M. and Barrera, E. V., in X-Ray Absorption Fine Structure, edt. Hasnain, S. S., Ellis Horwood Pub., 242 (1991).Google Scholar
9. Ruckman, M. W., Jiang, L., and Strogin, M., J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A, 8, 134 (1990).Google Scholar
10. Barrera, E. V., Ruckman, M. W., and Heald, S. M., Proc. MRS, 159, 69 (1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Nastasi, M., Hung, L. S., and Mayer, J. W., Appl. Phys. Lett., 44, 511 (1984).Google Scholar
12. Colgan, E. G., Nastasi, M., and Mayer, J. W., J. Appl. Phys., 58, 4125 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Binsted, N., Gurmán, S. J., and Cambell, J. W., EXCURVE 88 Program, SERC Darsbury Laboratory, Darsbury, 1988.Google Scholar