Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:52:05.691Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Design, Characteristics and Performance of Diamond Pad Conditioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Douglas J. Pysher
Affiliation:
[email protected], 3M, Electronics Markets Materials Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States
Brian Goers
Affiliation:
[email protected], 3M, Electronics Markets Materials Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States
John Zabasajja
Affiliation:
[email protected], 3M, Electronics Markets Materials Division, St. Paul, Minnesota, United States
Get access

Abstract

A wide range of diamond pad conditioner (disk) designs have been characterized and key performance metrics have been collected. Relationships between design characteristics including diamond size and shape, spatial density, and tip height distribution and polishing pad wear rates and pad surface textures have been established for a variety of pads.

Estimation of the depth-of-penetration of working diamonds, from used disk analyses, allows meaningful topographic assessments of alternative conditioner designs and predictions of relative performance. An example of an improved conditioner that illustrates this design methodology is given.

Conditioner aggressiveness and its decay in various slurries have been measured to assess disk lifetime in Chemical Mechanical Planarization (CMP) processes environments. Key factors affecting disk lifetime are discussed and an improved-lifetime conditioner for use in aggressive slurries will be reviewed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Lawing, A.S. CMP-MIC 33–42 (2005).Google Scholar
2 Engfer, T. Goers, B. Zagrebelny, A. Zazzera, L. 12th International Symposium on CMP (CAMP) (2007).Google Scholar
3 Kasai, T. Nam, C.W. Li, S. Kasthurirangan, J. Fortino, W. Homma, Y. Tanaka, S. Prasad, A. Gaudet, G. Sun, F. Naman, A. ICPT, 91–96 (2009)Google Scholar
4 Lawing, A. S. and Juras, C. ICPT, 25–30 (2007)Google Scholar
5 Kamo, S. Miyauchi, H. Shida, H. ICPT, 279–284 (2009).Google Scholar
6 Banerjee, G. and Rhoades, R. ECS Trans., 13 [4] 119 (2008).Google Scholar
7 Sun, F. Hawkins, J. Tsai, J. Chiu, G. Naman, A. ECS Trans., 18 [1] 517522 (2009).Google Scholar
8 Akaji, M., Haba, S. Yoshida, K. Isobe, A. Kinoshita, M. ICPT, 97–102 (2009).Google Scholar