Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T17:55:40.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Curvature Of Rectangular Coated Foils With Different Width-To-Length Ratios

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

M. D. Tran ,
W. P. Vellinga  and
J. H. Dautzenberg
M. D. Tran
Affiliation:
Materials Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
W. P. Vellinga
Affiliation:
Materials Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
J. H. Dautzenberg
Affiliation:
Materials Technology, Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, P.O.Box 513, 5600 MB Eindhoven, The Netherlands
Get access

Abstract

This paper concerns the bending of rectangular foils with different width-to-length ratios, coated with a layer with high internal stress. Framework for the interpretation of experimental results is a description of the bending based on geometrically nonlinear elasticity. Calculations indicate that the (mean) biaxial modulus of coatings on foils may be determined by this method. Fully isotropic and isotropic-orthotropic bilayers are considered. Preliminary experimental results, of unbalanced magnetron sputtered PVD TiN coatings on stainless steel foil, are shown to be in qualitative agreement with the geometrically non-linear description of the bending of coated foils, provided anisotropy of the substrate and clamping conditions are taken into account.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 505 , 1997 , 533
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1.Masters, C. B. and Salomon, N. J., Int.J.Eng.Sci. 31, p.915–925 (1993).Google Scholar
2.Masters, C. B. and Salomon, N. J., ASME J.Appl.Mech. 61, p. 872–878 (1994).Google Scholar
3.Fahnline, D. E.,Masters, C. B. and Salomon, N. J., J.Vac.Sci.Technol. A9, p.2483–2487 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Realised in [1], but not yet in [5]. Results presented there for L x ≠L y are not valid.Google Scholar
5.Harper, B. D. and Wu, C. P., Int.J.Sol.Struct. 25, p.511–525 (1990).Google Scholar
6.Brenner, A. and Senderoff, S., J.Res.Nat.Bur.Stand. 42, p. 105–123 (1949).Google Scholar
7.RöII, K., J.Appl.Phys. 47, p.3224–3229 (1976).Google Scholar