Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:33:11.562Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Copper surface protection by organothiol self-assembled monolayers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 May 2015

Sira Suren
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Supattra Haokratoke
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Soorathep Kheawhom
Affiliation:
Department of Chemical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
Get access

Abstract

This work investigates the effects of concentration of organothiol molecules and temperature used during self-assembled monolayers (SAMs) formation on quality of the organothiol SAMs coating layer obtained in terms of wettability, corrosion inhibition efficiency and carbon to copper ratio. The organothiol SAMs were coated on copper substrates prepared by electro-polishing followed by oxygen plasma treatment for 15 s. Three types of organothiol SAMs including 1-octanethiol (OTT), 2-ethylhexanethiol (2-EHT) and 2-phenylethanethiol (2-PET) were investigated. Concentration of organothiol molecules ranging from 0.005 to 0.02 M in isopropanol and forming temperature ranging from -15 to 50°C were studied. It was found that all organothiol SAMs of 0.01 M provided the SAMs coating layer with the highest quality. The SAMs formed at 40°C with OTT and 2-EHT, and at 0°C with 2-PET were the most favorable condition with the highest water contact angle of 124.79o, 130.66o and 120.58o at corrosion inhibition efficiencies of 96.24%, 99.37% and 98.90%, respectively.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Panuthai, N., Savanglaa, R., Praserthdam, P., and Kheawhom, S., Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 53, 05HA11 (2014).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, K. C., Raoa, B.V.A., Iqbal, M.Y., and Sreedhar, B., Indian J. Chem. Technol. 16, 2531 (2009).Google Scholar
Ma, H.Y., Yang, C., Yin, B.S., Li, G.Y., Chen, S.H., and Luo, J.L., Appl. Surf. Sci. 218(1–4), 144154 (2003).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutt, D.A. and Liu, C., Appl. Surf. Sci. 252(2), 400411 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shen, C.H., and Lin, J.C., Colloids Surf. B. 101, 376383 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kongsumrit, P., and Kheawhom, S., Adv. Material. Res. 646, 1823 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Love, J. C., Estroff, L. A., Kriebel, J. K., Nuzzo, R. G., and Whitesides, G. M., Chem. Rev. 105, 11031169 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar