Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T17:29:25.404Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Controlling Swelling of Portland Brownstone

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

Timothy Wangler  and
George W. Scherer
Timothy Wangler
Affiliation:
[email protected], Princeton University, Chemical Engineering, Eng. Quad. E-211, Princeton, NJ, 08544, United States
George W. Scherer
Affiliation:
[email protected], Princeton University, Civil & Env. Eng., Eng. Quad. E-319, Princeton, NJ, 08544, United States
Get access

Abstract

Many clay-bearing sedimentary stones such as Portland Brownstone will swell when exposed to water, and this can generate damaging stresses as differential strains evolve during a wetting cycle. Current swelling inhibitors, consisting of α,ω-diaminoalkanes, can reduce swelling in Portland Brownstone up to 50%. In this study, through X-ray diffraction and swelling strain experiments, we demonstrate that the α,ω-diaminoalkanes inhibit swelling by substituting for interlayer cations and partially hydrophobicizing the interlayer, then rehydrating on subsequent wetting cycles. We also introduce the copper (II) ethylenediamine complex as a potential treatment for swelling inhibition.

Keywords

intercalationgeologicorganic
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1047: Symposium Y – Materials Issues in Art and Archaeology VIII , 2007 , 1047-Y05-03
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2008

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1.“Internal stress and cracking in stone and masonry”, Scherer, G.W., pp. 633–641 in Measuring, Monitoring and Modeling Concrete Properties, ed. Konsta-Gdoutos, M.S. (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006).Google Scholar
2.“Hygric Swelling of Portland Brownstone”, Gonzalez, I. Jimenez, Higgins, M., and Scherer, G.W., pp. 21–27 in Materials Issues in Art & Archaeology VI, MRS Symposium Proc. Vol. 712, eds. Vandiver, P.B., Goodway, M., and Mass, J.L. (Materials Res. Soc., Warrendale, PA, 2002).Google Scholar
3. Tutuncu, A.N., Podio, A.L., Gregory, A.R., and Sharma, M.M., “Nonlinear viscoelastic behavior of sedimentary rocks, Part I: Effect of frequency and strain amplitude”, Geophysics 63 (1) 184–194 (1998).Google Scholar
4. Barton, N., Lien, R., and Lunde, J., “Engineering classification of rock masses for the design of tunnel support”, Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 6 (4) 189–236 (1974).Google Scholar
5. Boek, E.S., Coveney, P.V., and Skipper, N.T., “Monte Carlo Modeling Studies of Hydrated Li-, Na-, and K-Smectites: Understanding the Role of Potassium as a Clay Swelling Inhibitor”, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 117 12608–12617 (1995).Google Scholar
6. Mohamed, A.M.O., “The role of clay minerals in marly soils on its stability”, Engineering Geology, 57 (3-4), 193–203 (2000).Google Scholar
7. Rodrigues, J. Delgado, “Swelling behaviour of stones and its interest in conservation. An appraisal”, Materiales de Construcción, 51 (263-264) 183–195 (2001).Google Scholar
8.“Consolidation and hydrophobic treatment of natural stone”, Wendler, E., Klemm, D.D., Snethlage, R., in Proc. 5th Int. Conf. on Durability of Building Materials and Components, eds. Baker, J.M., Nixon, P.J., Majumdar, A.J., and Davies, H. (Chapman & Hall, London), 203–212.Google Scholar
9.“Easter Island tuff: laboratory studies for its consolidation”, Wendler, E., Charola, A.E., Fitzner, B., Proc. of the 8th Int. Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, ed Riederer, J. (Berlin, Germany) (2), 1159–1170.Google Scholar
10. Jiminez, I. Gonzalez, Scherer, G.W., “Effect of swelling inhibitors on the swelling and stress relaxation of clay bearing stones”, Env. Geo. 46 364–377 (2004).Google Scholar
11. Wangler, T., Wylykanowitz, A., and Scherer, G.W.. “Controlling stress from swelling clay”, pp. 703–708 in Measuring, Monitoring and Modeling Concrete Properties, ed. Konsta-Gdoutos, M.S. (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006).Google Scholar
12.“Evaluating the potential damage to stones from wetting and drying cycles”, González, I. Jiménez and Scherer, G.W., pp. 685–693 in Measuring, Monitoring and Modeling Concrete Properties, ed. Konsta-Gdoutos, M.S. (Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2006).Google Scholar
13. Wangler, T. and Scherer, G.W., “Clay swelling mechanism in clay-bearing sandstones”, Env. Geo., submitted.Google Scholar
14. Poppe, L.J., Paskevich, V.F., Hathaway, J.C., and Blackwood, D.S.. “U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 01-041: A Laboratory Manual for X-Ray Powder Diffractionfl (2001). http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2001/of01-041/index.htmGoogle Scholar
15. Stadler, M. and Schindler, P.W., “The effect of dissolved ligands on the sorption of Cu(II) by Ca-montmorillonite”, Clays Clay Miner. 42 148–160 (1994).Google Scholar
16. Senkayi, A.L., Dixon, J.B., and Hossner, L.R., “Transformation of Chlorite to Smectite Through Regularly Interstratified Intermediates”, Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 45 650–656 (1981).Google Scholar
17. Bergaya, F. and Vayer, M., “CEC of clays: Measurement by adsorption of a copper ethylenediamine complex”, Applied Clay Science, 12 275–280 (1997).Google Scholar