Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:31:51.759Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Control and Operation Schemes for Micro-Thermal Conductivity Detectors in Gas Chromatography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Bradley C Kaanta ,
Hua Chen  and
Xin Zhang
Bradley C Kaanta
Affiliation:
[email protected], Boston University, Mechanical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Hua Chen
Affiliation:
[email protected], Schlumberger Doll Research, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States
Xin Zhang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Boston University, Mechanical Engineering, Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Get access

Abstract

As the use of sensor networks has expanded, the demand for robust detectors able to operate in a variety of environments has grown. We present the sensitivity testing of a micro thermal conductivity detector (μTCD) operating in two different modes. The microfabricated device we have designed and tested is composed of a resistive heating element suspended in a micro-channel, which creates excellent thermal isolation and a high heat transfer coefficient between the element and the fluid. The sensitivity of a μTCD integrated into a micro-gas chromatography (GC) system, can be increased by a factor of 10 simply by switching between operation in constant temperature and constant voltage modes. This result agrees with the analytical models and testing data previously reported for macro systems and devices.

Keywords

microelectro-mechanical (MEMS)sensorthermal conductivity
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1222: Symposium DD – Microelectromechanical Systems — Materials and Devices III , 2009 , 1222-DD05-20
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Grob, R. L., Barry, E. F., Ed., Modern Practice of Gas Chromatography, 4th ed. Hoboken, , NJ: Wiley, 2004, pp. 289–295.Google Scholar
2 Littlewood, A.B. Gas Chromatography, 2ed. New York: Academic Press 1970, pp. 339–362.Google Scholar
3 Lawson, A. E. Miller, J. M. “Thermal Conductivity Detectors in Gas Chromatography,” Journal of Gas Chromatography, vol. 4, pp. 273–284, Aug 1966.Google Scholar
4 Wittebrood, R.T. “Comparison between a thermal conductivity detector with constant filament temperature and a conventional cathorometer,” Chromatographia, vol. 5, pp. 454–459, 1972.Google Scholar
5 Wells, G. Simon, R. “Thermal conductivity detector: theory and numerical model,” Journal of Chromatography A, vol. 256, pp. 1–15, 1983.Google Scholar
6 Kaanta, B. C. et al. , “High sensitivity micro-thermal conductivity detector for gas chromatography,” in 22ed Intl. Conf. MEMS, 2009, pp. 264–267.Google Scholar
7 Wu, Y.E. Chen, K. Chen, C.W. Hsu, K.H. “Fabrication and Characterization of Thermal Conductivity Detectors (TCDs) of Different Flow Channel and Heater Designs,” Sensor and Actuators A, vol. 100, pp. 37–45, 2002.Google Scholar
8 Cruz, D. et al. , “Microfabricated Thermal Conductivity Detector for the Micro-ChemLab,” Sensors and Actuators B, vol. 121, pp. 414–422, 2007.Google Scholar