Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T21:45:46.822Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Computer Simulation of Misfit Dislocation Mobility in Cu/Ni and Cu/Ag Interfaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2011

Richard J Kurtz ,
Richard G. Hoagland  and
Howard L. Heinisch Jr.
Richard J Kurtz
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352
Richard G. Hoagland
Affiliation:
Los Alamos National Laboratory Los Alamos, NM 87545
Howard L. Heinisch Jr.
Affiliation:
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory Richland, WA 99352
Get access

Abstract

The mobility of misfit dislocations in semicoherent Cu/Ni and Cu/Ag interfaces is determined by molecular dynamics and elastic band simulation methods. Cube-on-cube oriented Cu/Ni and Cu/Ag systems were studied with the interfaces parallel to (010). Core structures of misfit dislocations in semicoherent interfaces are found to be quite different in these systems. In Cu/Ni the misfits have very narrow cores in the plane of the interface. Consequently, the shear stress to move these dislocations is large, ∼1.1 GPa. The core width and hence the misfit mobility can be changed by placing the misfit away from the chemical interface. Placement of the misfit oneatom layer into the Cu increased the core width a factor of 1.6 and lowered the threshold shear stress to 0.4 GPa. The misfit dislocations in Cu/Ag interfaces, on the other hand, are wide and therefore are much more mobile. The threshold shear stress for misfit movement in Cu/Ag is very low, ∼0.03 GPa.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 634: Symposium B – Structure and Mechanical Properties of Nanophase Materials-Theory & Computer Simulations vs. Experiment , 2000 , B2.9.1
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2001

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

[1] Misra, A., Verdier, M., Lu, Y., Kung, H., Mitchell, T., Nastasi, M., and Embury, J., “Structure and mechanical properties of Cu-X (X-Nb, Cr, Ni) nanolayered composites,” Scripta Materialia, vol. 39, pp. 555, 1998.Google Scholar
[2] Kurtz, R. J., Hoagland, R. G., and Hirth, J. P., “Effect of Extrinsic Grain-Boundary Defects on Grain-Boundary Sliding Resistance,” Phil. Mag. A, vol. 79, pp. 665, 1999.Google Scholar
[3] Voter, A. F. and Chen, S. P., “Accurate Interatomic Potentials for Nickel, Aluminum and Ni sub 3 Al,” presented at Characterization of Defects in Materials, Boston, Massachusetts, 1987.Google Scholar
[4] Voter, A. F., Intermetallic Compounds, Principles and Practice, vol. 77: J. Wiley, 1993.Google Scholar
[5] Barnett, D. M. and Lothe, J., “Image Force Theorem for Dislocations in Anisotropic Bicrystals,” J. Phys. F: Metal Phys, vol. 4, pp. 1618, 1974.Google Scholar
[6] Jossang, T. and Hirth, J., “Anisotropic Elasticity Solutions for Dislocation Barriers in Face-Centered Cubic Crystals,” J Appl Phys, vol. 36, pp. 2400, 1965.Google Scholar
[7] Mills, G., Jonsson, H., and Schenter, G. K., “Reversible work transition state theory: application to dissociative adsorption of hydrogen,” Surf. Sci., vol. 324, pp. 305, 1995.Google Scholar