Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-09T16:01:27.874Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Comparison Of Thermally- And Irradiation-Induced Grain Boundary Segregation In Austenitic Stainless Steels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 February 2011

Edward A. Kenik
Edward A. Kenik*
Affiliation:
Metals and Ceramics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831–6376
Get access

Abstract

Segregation at grain boundaries in austenitic stainless steels sensitized by either thermal annealing or irradiation was studied by analytical electron microscopy. Characterization of grain boundary compositions in both types of materials was performed by high spatial resolution (≥2 nm) X-ray microanalysis. Whereas similar chromium depletion is observed in both processes, there are differences in the behavior of the other alloying elements and in the mechanisms responsible for the segregation. In thermal sensitization, the nickel/iron ratio and the silicon level observed at grain boundaries are similar to those for the matrix. In cases where little or no precipitation occurs, co-segregation of phosphorus, chromium, and molybdenum occurs at boundaries and interfaces. For radiation sensitization, radiation-induced segregation (RIS) results in enrichment of nickel, silicon, and, in certain cases, phosphorus and in depletion of iron at grain boundaries. There appears to be some synergism between segregation of nickel and silicon, which increases the magnitude of RIS effects. Grain boundary precipitation is often observed in both thermally- and irradiation-sensitized materials. However, the nature and origins of the two types of precipitation are different. The formation of chromium-enriched grain boundary carbides is the cause of the chromium depletion in thermal sensitization. In contrast, the precipitates produced by irradiation are enriched in nickel and silicon and depleted in chromium relative to the matrix and therefore are the result of RIS. Results for thermal- and radiation-induced segregation in manganese-stabilized austenites are compared to that for nickel-stabilized austenites.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 238: Symposium Cb – Structure and Properties of Interfaces in Materials , 1991 , 457
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Jacobs, A. J. and Wozadlo, G. P., in Proc. Int. Conf. on Nuclear Power Plant Aging. Availability Factor, and Reliability Analysis (ASM, Metals Park, OH, 1985) p. 173.Google Scholar
2. Norris, D. I. R., ed. Proc. Svmp. Radiation-Induced Sensitization of Stainless Steels (Berkeley Nuclear Laboratory, CEGB, 1986).Google Scholar
3. Hall, E.X. and Briant, C.L., Met. Trans. 15A 793 (1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Kenik, E.A., Met. Trans. 22A, 253 (1991).Google Scholar
5. Bell, G., Tortorelli, P., Kenik, E., and Klueh, R., J. Nucl. Mater. 179–181. 615 (1991).Google Scholar
6. Kenik, E.A., Maziasz, P.J., and Klueh, R.L., in Proc. 47th Meeting of the Electron Microscopy Society of America, edited Bailey, G.W. (San Francisco Press 1989), p. 284.Google Scholar
7. Kenik, E.A., Inazumi, T., and Bell, G.E.C., J. Nucl. Mater. 183, 145 (1991).Google Scholar
8. Kenik, E. A., accepted for J. Nucl. Mater.Google Scholar
9. Marwick, A. D., Piller, R. C, and Siveli, P. M., J. Nucl. Mater. 83, 35 (1979).Google Scholar