Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:51:48.534Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chemical Behavior and Corrosion Resistance of Medical Grade Titanium after Surface Modification by Means of Ion Implantation Techniques

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2011

Frank Schrempel
Affiliation:
[email protected], Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Festkörperphysik, Max-Wien-Platz 1, Jena, N/A, N/A, Germany
Gerhard Hildebrand
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institut für Bioprozess- und Analysenmesstechnik e.V., Fachbereich Biowerkstoffe, Germany
Marion Frant
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institut für Bioprozess- und Analysenmesstechnik e.V., Fachbereich Biowerkstoffe, Germany
Werner Wesch
Affiliation:
[email protected], Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Festkörperphysik, Germany
Klaus Liefeith
Affiliation:
[email protected], Institut für Bioprozess- und Analysenmesstechnik e.V., Fachbereich Biowerkstoffe, Germany
Get access

Abstract

This work presents data on topographical structure, chemical surface composition, physicochemical properties and corrosion resistance of medical grade titanium after ion implantation. Pure commercial titanium has been implanted with 30 keV Na-, Ca- and P-ions at fluences of 2.0 × 1017 cm-2 and 1.5 × 1017 cm-2, respectively. Some of the samples were heat treated at 600 °C for 40 min. Atomic force microscopy (AFM) was used for surface analysis. The chemical composition was investigated using Rutherford backscattering spectrometry (RBS). Physicochemical investigations were carried out using contact angle measurements to determine the polarity of the modified titanium surfaces. Moreover, the electrokinetic zeta potentials on a physiological pH value have been determined. Finally, the corrosion resistance was examined in simulated body fluid (SBF) containing 4 g/l bovine serum albumin (BSA) using cyclic voltametry.

Considering the P-implantations, the measured depth distribution of phosphorus agrees well with calculations. For the implantation of Na and Ca, the concentration of implanted atoms in the maximum of the depth distribution is noticeably lower and the distribution extends to larger depths compared to the predictions. This finding is associated with a strong incorporation of oxygen over the whole penetration depth of the implanted ions. According to topographical and chemical changes different contact angles as well as zeta potentials have been detected for the ion implanted surfaces compared to pure titanium. The electrochemical examinations indicate that the implantation has no negative influence on the corrosion resistance in comparison to unmodified medical grade titanium. The results show that ion implantation using certain ions can be used to design tailor-made titanium surfaces from a physicochemical point of view.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2006

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Kokubo, T., Kim, H.M., Kawashita, M. and Nakamura, T., J. Mat. Sci.: Materials in Medicine 15 (2), 99 (2004).Google Scholar
2 Pham, M.T., Matz, W., Reuter, H., Richter, E., G. Steiner and Oswald, S., Surf. Coat. Technol. 128–129, 313 (2000).Google Scholar
3 Wieser, E., Tsyganov, I., Matz, W., Reuther, H., Oswald, S., Pham, T. and Richter, E., Surf. Coat. Technol. 111, 103 (1999).Google Scholar
4 Pham, M.T., Maitz, M.F., Matz, W., Reuther, H., Richter, E. and Steiner, G., Thin Solid Films 379, 50 (2000).Google Scholar
5 Li, P., Kangasniemi, I., de Groot, K. and Kokubo, T., J. American Ceramic Soc. 5, 1307 (1994).Google Scholar
6 Ziegler, J.F., Biersack, J.P., Littmark, U., The Stopping and Range of Ions in Solids, Pergamon, New York, 2003.Google Scholar
7 Barradas, N.P., Jeynes, C. and Webb, R.P., Appl. Phys. Lett. 71, 291 (1997).Google Scholar
8 Schrempel, F., Cai, K.Y., Bossert, J., Jandt, K.D., in preparation.Google Scholar
9 Schrempel, F., Hildebrand, G., Liefeith, K., in preparation.Google Scholar
10 Zitter, H., Werkstoffe und Korrosion 39, 12, 574582 (1988)Google Scholar