Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-t5tsf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T08:44:49.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Characterization Of Chemical Bath Deposited Cds On Single Crystal InP Substrates

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 February 2011

G. M. Riker
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401
M. M. Al-Jassim
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401
F. S. Hasoon
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO 80401
Get access

Abstract

We have investigated CdS thin films as possible passivating window layers for InP. The films were deposited on single crystal InP by chemical bath deposition (CBD). The film thickness, as optically determined by ellipsometry, was varied from 500 to 840Å. The film morphology was investigated by high resolution scanning electron microscopy (SEM), whereas the film microstructure was studied by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and cross-sectional transmission electron microscopy (TEM). Most of the films were fine-grained polycrystalline CdS, with some deposition conditions resulting in epitaxial growth. Cross-sectional TEM examination revealed the presence of interface contaminants. The effect of such contaminants on the film morphology and microstructure was studied, and various approaches for InP surface cleaning/treatment were investigated. The epitaxial films were determined to be hexagonal on both the (111) and (100) InP substrates; however, they were heavily faulted.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Basak, R. L., Chaudhuri, S., and Pal, A. K., J. Mater. Sci. Let. 7 (10), p. 10481049 (1988), and References within.Google Scholar
2. Bhattacharyya, D. and Carter, M. J., Thin Solid Films 288, p. 176181 (1996).Google Scholar
3. Oladeji, I. O. and Chow, L., J. Electrochem. Soc. 7 (144), p. 23422346 (1997).Google Scholar
4. Webb, J., Rose, D., Niles, D., Swartzlander, A., and Al-Jassim, M. M. (Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf., Anaheim, CA, 1997), to be published.Google Scholar
5. Kylner, A., Rockett, A., and Stolt, L., Solid State Phenomena 51–52, p. 533540 (1996).Google Scholar
6. Vaccaro, K., Dauplaise, H., Davis, A., Spaziani, S., and Lorenzo, J., Appl. Phys. Lett. 24 (4), p.527529 (1995).Google Scholar
7. Choi, J. Y., Kim, K., and Kim, D. (Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf., Anaheim, CA, 1997), to be published.Google Scholar
8. Gallet, D. and Hollinger, G., Appl. Phys. Lett. 982, p.62 (1993).Google Scholar
9. Vaccaro, K., Davis, A., Dauplaise, H., Spaziani, S., Martin, E., and Lorenzo, J., J. Elect. Mat. 25 (4), p. 603609 (1996).Google Scholar
10. Vigil, O., Riech, I., Garcia-Rocha, M., and Zelaya-Angel, O., J. Vac. Sci. Tech. A 15 (4), p. 22822286 (1997).Google Scholar
11. Lincot, D., Mokili, B., Froment, M., Cortes, R., Bernard, C., Witz, C., and Lafait, J., J. Phys. Chem. B 101, p. 21742181 (1997).Google Scholar
12. Hasoon, F.S., Al-Jassim, M.M., Swartzlander, A., Sheldon, P., AI-Douri, A.A.J., and Alnajjar, A.A. (Proc. 26th IEEE Photovoltaics Specialists Conf., Anaheim, CA, 1997), to be published.Google Scholar
13. Walck, S. D. and McCaffrey, J. P., The Small Angle Cleavage Technique: An Update, (Poster at Microscopy Society of America Conference, Cleveland, Ohio, August 1997.)Google Scholar