Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T15:30:56.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Catalytic Activity of Ceria-Based Complex Metal Oxides in Alkaline and Acidic Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2013

Matthew C Schrandt
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering and Science Program, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, U.S.A.
Praveen Kolla
Affiliation:
Materials Engineering and Science Program, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, U.S.A.
A. Smirnova
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Biological Science, South Dakota School of Mines and Technology, Rapid City, SD 57701, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

Pt catalysts are the leading catalysts for use in ORR. However, Pt is an expensive catalyst and with limited supply can not be considered a sustainable material for feasible application that is scalable in the economy. This calls for new solutions for catalyst materials that either mitigate the amount of Pt used in catalysts by developing hybrid catalysts, or to replace Pt altogether with a material with similar or better catalytic activity. Perovskite LSCF and Fluorite GDC materials with proven catalytic activity in solid oxide fuel cells are herein explored for their catalytic reduction of oxygen for use at low temperatures. Since the materials lack electronic conductivity at low temperatures, we have improved their conductivity with graphene. The resulting materials are compared to Pt in their ORR catalytic capabilities and electronic conductivity.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Vielstich, W., Okokawa, H., and Gasteiger, H.A., Handbook of Fuel Cells: Fundamentals, Technology, and Applications, Vol. 5 (WILEY, 2009).Google Scholar
Gasteiger, H.A., Kocha, S.S., Sompalli, B., and Wagner, F.T., App. Cat. B, 56, 935 (2005).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mogensen, M., Sammes, N.M., Tompett, G.A., Solid State Ion. 129, 63 (2000).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechini, M. P., United States Patent Office, Patent no. 3,330,697 (1967).Google Scholar
Sikalidis, C., Advances in Ceramics – Synthesis and Characterization, Processing and Specific Applications, p.423 (InTech, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poux, T., Napolskiy, F.S., Dintzer, T., Kerangueven, G., Istomin, S.Y., Tsirlina, G.A., Antipov, E.V., and Savinova, E.R., Catalysis Today 189, 8392 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Song, C. and Zhang, J., PEM Fuel Cell Electrocatalysts and Catalyst Layers, (2008) p. 101.Google Scholar
Wang, H., Leonard, S.L., and Hu, Y.H., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 50 (32), 10613-10620 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Q. and Chen, F., Mat. Res. Bull., 44(11), 20562061 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sakaliuniene, J., Cyviene, J., Abakeviciene, B., and Dudonis, J., Acta Physica Polanica A, 120, 6365 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar