Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T11:12:15.987Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Branched amphiphilic polysulfides: influence of macromolecular architecture on self-assembly and oxidation responsiveness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 May 2015

Richard d’Arcy
Affiliation:
Centre for Tissue Injury & Repair, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
Nicola Tirelli*
Affiliation:
Centre for Tissue Injury & Repair, Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom North West Centre for Advanced Drug Delivery, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PT, United Kingdom
*
*to whom correspondence should be addressed. [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

2-, 4-, 6- and 8-arm star amphiphilic block copolymers were prepared with the branching point located in the hydrophobic core composed of poly(propylene sulfide) (PPS); poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) pendant chains completed the macromolecular structure. The level of branching influenced the rigidity of the PPS core and of the overall macromolecule, with the Mark-Houwink parameter a gradually approaching the value typical of globules for 6 and 8 arms. A binary behavior (linear vs. branched) was noticed for the kinetics of oxidation by H2O2 and the stability of the colloidal aggregates formed in water: irrespective of the number of arms, all branched polymers showed a slower response (to oxidation) and a more stable hydrophobic domains (a critical micellar concentration < 0.01 mg/mL).

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Khutoryanskiy, V.V. and Tirelli, N., Pure Appl. Chem. 80, 1703 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hu, P. and Tirelli, N., React. Funct. Polym. 71, 303 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehor, A., Schmoekel, H., Tirelli, N. and Hubbell, J.A., Biomaterials 29, 1958 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gao, H.F., Macromol. Rapid Commun. 33, 722 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, K.Y., Bouhadir, K.H. and Mooney, D.J., Biomacromolecules 3, 1129 (2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar