Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T10:43:08.706Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Authentic Science Research and the Utilization of Nanoscience in the Non-Traditional Classroom Setting

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 January 2011

Deborah A. Day ,
Zizi Yu ,
Zelun Wang ,
Jennifer Dalecki ,
Arian Jadbabaie ,
Emily Z. Feng ,
Thomas J. Mattessich ,
Christine Caragianis-Broadbridge ,
Mark A. Reed  and
Ryan Munden
Deborah A. Day
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Zizi Yu
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Zelun Wang
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Jennifer Dalecki
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Arian Jadbabaie
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Emily Z. Feng
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Thomas J. Mattessich
Affiliation:
[email protected], Amity Senior High School, Woodbridge, Connecticut, United States
Christine Caragianis-Broadbridge
Affiliation:
[email protected]@gmail.com, Southern Connecticut State University, Physics, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Mark A. Reed
Affiliation:
[email protected], Yale University, Department of Applied Physics, New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Ryan Munden
Affiliation:
[email protected], United States
Get access

Abstract

Applications of nanoscience in the non-traditional classroom have successfully exposed students to various methods of research with applications to micro- and nano-electronics. Activities obtained from the NanoSense website associated with current global energy and water concerns are solid examples. In this regard, all 36 students in the 2008-2009 Science Research Program (SRP) prepared and delivered individual and group lesson plans in addition to their authentic, year-long research projects. Two out of 36 students selected nanoscience based projects in preparation for science fair competition in 2009. Additionally, preliminary research was conducted while participating in the Center for Research on Interface Structures and Phenomena (CRISP) Research Experience for Teachers (RET) Program in summer 2008 which supported the idea of developing a photolithography kit. This kit is intended to introduce high school students to the fundamentals of photolithography. In this paper, the design, implementation and feasibility of this kit in the high school classroom is described as well as details involving individual and group nanoscience based projects. Supporting educational models include self-regulated learning (SRL) concepts; situated cognition; social constructivism; Renzulli's (1977) enrichment triad and Types I – III inquiry enrichment activities.

Keywords

educationnanoscalescanning electron microscopy (SEM)
Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1233: Symposium PP – Materials Education , 2009 , 1233-PP04-32
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1NanoSense materials were developed by SRI International, with support from the National Science Foundation under Grant No. ESI-0426319.Google Scholar
2 Reeves, Todd D. “Toward a treatment effect of an intervention to foster self-regulated learning (SRL); an application of the Rasch Model.” Thesis. Graduate School, University at Buffalo, State University of NewYork, 2009. Print.Google Scholar
3 Renzulli, J.S. (1977). The enrichment triad model: A guide for developing defensible programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
4 Pavlica, Dr. Robert. “Replicating a Successful Science Research Program.” Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 15.4 (2004): 148–54. Print.Google Scholar
5 Iran-Nejad, A. (1990). Active and dynamic self-regulation of learning processes. Review of Educational Research, 60(4), 537–602.Google Scholar
6 Puustinen, M., & Pulkkinen, L. (2001). Models of self-regulated learning: A review. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 269–286.Google Scholar
7 LaBanca, F. (2008). Impact of problem finding on the quality of authentic open inquiry science research projects. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Danbury, CT: Western Connecticut State University.Google Scholar
8 Roth, W-M. & Roychoudhury, A. (1993). The development of science process skills in authentic contexts. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 30, 127–152.Google Scholar
9 Frawley, , William, . Vygotsky and cognitive science language and the unification of the social and computational mind. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard UP, 1997. Print.Google Scholar
10 Martin-Hansen, L. (2002). Defining inquiry. The Science Teacher, 69, 34–37.Google Scholar
11 Jaeger, C. Richard. Introduction to Microelectric Fabrication, Second Edition, Volume V.: Prentice Hall, 1996.Google Scholar
12 Van Grieken, R., Markowicz, A., and Török, Sz.. “Energy-Dispersive X-Ray Spectrometry: Present State and Trends. ”Fresenius' Journal of Analytical Chemistry 324.8 (1986): 825–831.Google Scholar
13 Firestien, R.L., & Treffinger, D.J. (1989). Update: Guidelines for effective facilitation of creative problem solving. The Gifted Child Today, 12, 44–47.Google Scholar
14 Renzulli, J.S. & Reis, S. M. (1986). The enrichment triad/revolving door model: A schoolwide plan for the development of creative productivity. In Renzulli, J.S. (Ed.), Systems and models for developing programs for the gifted and talented. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar