Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-j824f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:28:03.875Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Atomic Transport in Irradiated Solids

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 February 2011

R.R. Averback ,
Mai Ghaly ,
Y.Y. Lee  and
H. Zhu
R.R. Averback
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Mai Ghaly
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Y.Y. Lee
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
H. Zhu
Affiliation:
Department of Materials Science and Engineering and the Materials Research Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801
Get access

Abstract

Atomic transport in irradiated solids has been investigated in both the prompt and delayed regimes. Prompt effects are revealed on an atomic level through molecular dynamics computer simulations. It is demonstrated that for metals like gold, which have high atomic numbers and low melting points, thermal spikes play a primary role in the cascade dynamics and that concepts like melting and rapid quenching are useful descriptions. Surface effects in these metals are also discussed. For metals with higher melting points and lower atomic numbers, the cascade dynamics are determined almost exclusively by energetic collisions far above thermal energies. This is illustrated by simulations of cascades in NiAl. The effect of the high ordering energy in this intermetallic compound on the radiation-induced defect structure has also been studied.

Atomic transport in the delayed regime is illustrated by two examples: an order-disorder alloy, Cu3Au, and an amorphous alloy, NiZr. The first example is used to illustrate various aspects of radiation enhanced diffusion (RED): ion beam mixing, diffusion kinetics, the effects of primary recoil spectrum, and the importance of chemical order. The second example illustrates that the basic theory of RED, which was developed to describe crystalline materials, appears to work adequately for amorphous metal alloys, suggesting that similar mechanisms may be operating. It is shown, however, that the kinetics of RED observed in amorphous alloys are not unique to point defect models.

Type
Research Article
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 311: Symposium O – Phase Transformations in Thin Films–Thermodynamics and Kinetics , 1993 , 209
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

1. Seidman, D.N., Averback, R.S. and Benedek, R., Phys. Stat. Sol. (b) 144, 85 (1987).Google Scholar
2. Rubia, T. Diaz De La, Averback, R.S., Benedek, R. and King, W.E., Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1930 (1987).Google Scholar
3. Rubia, T. Diaz De La and Guinan, M.W., J. Nucl. Mater. 174, 151 (1991).Google Scholar
4. Johnson, W.L., Cheng, Y.T., Rossum, R. Van and Nicolet, M.-A, Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B7/8, 657 (1985).Google Scholar
5. Kim, S.J., Nicolet, M.-A, Averback, R.S. and Peak, D., Phys. Rev. B37, 38 (1988).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Sigmund, P. Appl. Phys. Lett. 25, 169, (1974).Google Scholar
7. Sizmann, R., J. Nucl. Mater. 69/70, 386 (1978).Google Scholar
8. Ghaly, Mai and Averback, R.S., unpublished.Google Scholar
9. Belon, P. and Martin, G., this symposium.Google Scholar
10. Zhu, H. and Averback, R.S., unpublished.Google Scholar
11. Brinkman, J., J. Appl. Phys. 25 961 (1954).Google Scholar
12. Möller, W. and Eckstein, W., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B7/8, 645 (1985).Google Scholar
13. Rubia, T. Diaz de la and Guinan, M.W., UCRL-JC- 107488 (1991).Google Scholar
14. Rubia, T. Diaz de la, Caro, A., Spaczer, M., Janaway, G.A., Guinan, M.W., Victoria, M., Nucl. Instr. and Meth. B, (in press).Google Scholar
15. see e.g., Norgett, M.J., Robinson, M.T. and Torrens, I.M., Nurl. Eng. Design, 33,50, (1975).Google Scholar
16. Averback, R.S., Benedek, R. and Merkle, K.L., Phys. Rev. B13, 4156 (1978).Google Scholar
17. Jung, P., J. Nucl Mater. 117, 70 (1983).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Müller, A., Naundorf, V. and Macht, M.P., J. Appl. Phys. 64, 3445 (1988).Google Scholar
19. Lee, Y.S., Averback, R.S. and Flynn, C.P., Proc. Mat. Res. Soc.Vol. 235, 527 (1992); Y.S: Lee, R.S: Averback and C.P. Flynn, unpublishedGoogle Scholar
20. Averback, R.S., Rehn, L.E., Cook, R.E. and Wiedersich, H., in Phase Stability During Irradiation, (1980) eds. Hollandet, J.R. al. Proc. Met Soc. of AIME, Pitt. p.101.Google Scholar
21. see e.g., Russell, K.C., Prog. Mats. Sci. 28 239 (1984).Google Scholar
22. Caro, A. and Averback, R.S., unpublishedGoogle Scholar
23. Caro, A., Victoria, M. and Averback, R.S., J. Mater. Res. 5, 140 (1990).Google Scholar
24. Moser, P., Hautojarvi, P., Yli-Kauppila, J., Zurk, R. Van, and Chamberod, A.,Proc. 4th Int. Conf. on Rapidly Quenched Metals, Sendai (1982) Vol. 1, p. 759.Google Scholar
25. Averback, R.S. and Hahn, H., Phys. Rev. B37, 10383 (1988).Google Scholar