Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T04:02:42.713Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Anisotropic Composites of Desaminotyrosine and Desaminotyrosyl Tyrosine Functionalized Gelatin and Bioactive Glass Microparticles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 May 2015

Konstanze K. Julich-Gruner ,
Andreas Lendlein ,
Aldo R. Boccaccini  and
Axel T. Neffe
Konstanze K. Julich-Gruner
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Research and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
Andreas Lendlein
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Research and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
Aldo R. Boccaccini
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterials, University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Cauerstraße 6, 91058 Erlangen, Germany
Axel T. Neffe
Affiliation:
Institute of Biomaterial Research and Berlin-Brandenburg Centre for Regenerative Therapies, Helmholtz-Zentrum Geesthacht, Kantstrasse 55, 14513 Teltow, Germany
Get access

Abstract

Functionalization of gelatin with desaminotyrosine (DAT) and desamino tyrosyl tyrosine (DATT) has been demonstrated to allow network formation based on non-covalent interactions of the aromatic moieties. Based on the observation that the DAT(T) groups furthermore could interact with hydroxyapatite fillers, here it was investigated whether such interactions of DAT(T) could also be employed to stabilize composites formed by functionalized gelatins and bioactive glass (BG) particles. Because of sedimentation of the BG microparticles during the gelification, anisotropic composites with two distinct layers were formed. The characterization of mechanical properties by tensile tests and rheology showed that all composites of non-functionalized and DAT(T) functionalized gelatins with BG microparticles showed an increased Young’s modulus (E) up to 3 MPa, an increased storage modulus (G’) up to 100 kPa, increased tensile strength (σmax) up to 3.4 MPa, and increased loss modulus (G’’) compared to the pure matrices. As the observed effects were more pronounced in the DAT(T) functionalized gelatins compared to non-functionalized gelatins, and a much increased thermal stability of these composites was found, it is likely that there are binding interactions between the aromatic moieties and the BG microparticles. This effect open opportunities for the further development of this type of gelatin-based composites for bone regeneration applications.

Keywords

biomaterialcompositepolymer
Type
Articles
Information
MRS Online Proceedings Library (OPL) , Volume 1718: Symposium B – Multifunctional Polymeric and Hybrid Materials , 2015 , pp. 9 - 14
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Meyers, M.A., Chen, P.-Y., Lin, A.Y.-M. and Seki, Y., Prog. Mater. Sci. 53, 1 (2007).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fu, S.-Y., Feng, X.-Q., Lauke, B. and Mai, Y.-W., Composites, Part B 39B, 933 (2008).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaupa, A., Neffe, A.T., Pierce, B.F., Nochel, U. and Lendlein, A., Biomacromolecules 12, 75 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neffe, A.T., Loebus, A., Zaupa, A., Stoetzel, C., Mueller, F.A. and Lendlein, A., Acta Biomater. 7, 1693 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thein-Han, W.W. and Misra, R.D.K., Acta Biomater. 5, 1182 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q.Z., Thompson, I.D. and Boccaccini, A.R., Biomaterials 27, 2414 (2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerhardt, L.-C. and Boccaccini, A.R., Materials 3, 3867 (2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, A., Guldal, N.S. and Boccaccini, A.R., Biomaterials 32, 2757 (2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hench, L.L., Splinter, R.J., Allen, W.C. and Greenlee, T.K., J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 5, 117 (1971).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yan, L.-P., Silva-Correia, J., Oliveira, M.B., Vilela, C., Pereira, H., Sousa, R.A., Mano, J.F., Oliveira, A.L., Oliveira, J.M. and Reis, R.L., Acta Biomater. 12, 227 (2015).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, L., Cai, S., Wu, B., Mu, C., Zhang, G. and Lin, W., J. Inorg. Biochem. 117, 124 (2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, S.M., Pippel, E., Gosele, U., Dresbach, C., Qin, Y., Chandran, C.V., Brauniger, T., Hause, G. and Knez, M., Science 324, 488 (2009).CrossRefGoogle Scholar