Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-02T23:18:32.904Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Analysis of the ZnTe:Cu Contact on CdS/CdTe Solar Cells

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 February 2011

T.A. Gessert
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
M.J. Romero
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
R.G. Dhere
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
S.E. Asher
Affiliation:
National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL), Golden, CO 80401, U.S.A.
Get access

Abstract

We report on the recent use of cathodoluminescence (CL) to probe the depth-dependent changes in radiative recombination that occur in CdTe devices during ZnTe:Cu contacting procedures. These types of CL measurements may be useful to assist in linking impurity diffusion (e.g., Cu) from the contact with depth-dependent variation in electrical activation within the CdTe layer. Variable-energy CL suggests that diffusion from the ZnTe:Cu contact interface may assist in reducing effects of shallow donors in the CdTe bulk, and yield higher acceptor levels in the region near the contact. CL analysis near abrupt metal discontinuities provides estimates of diffusion lengths for carriers associated with both excitonic and donor-to-acceptor pair recombination. Finally, CL measurements at increasing excitation levels (i.e., increasing electron-beam current) provides estimates of the defect state density, as well as providing evidence that discrete multiple defect bands may exist in CdTe prior to contacting.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Materials Research Society 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1. Gessert, T.A., Duda, A., Asher, S.E., Narayanswamy, C., and Rose, D., Proc. 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., Anchorage, Alaska, Sept. 15-22, 2000 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA) pp. 654657.Google Scholar
2. Asher, S.E., et. al., Proc. 28th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conf., Anchorage, Alaska, Sept. 15-22, 2000 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA) pp. 479482.Google Scholar
3. Gessert, T.A., Romero, M.J., Johnston, S., Keyes, B., and Dippo, P., Proc. 29th IEEE PV Specialists Conf., New Orleans, LA, May 20-25, 2002 (IEEE, Piscataway, NJ, USA) pp. 535538.Google Scholar
4. Dobson, K.D., Visoly-Fisher, I., Hodes, G., Cahen, D., Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells 62 295325 (2000)Google Scholar
5. Rose, D., Hasoon, F., Dhere, R., Albin, D., Ribelin, R., Li, X., Mahathongdy, Y, Gessert, T., and Sheldon, P., Prog. Photovolt: Res. Appl. 7, 3312–340 (1999).Google Scholar
6. Hofmann, D.M., Omling, P., and Grimmeiss, H.G., Phys. Rev. B, 45 (11) 1992 62476250.Google Scholar
7. Romero, M.J., Gessert, T.A., and Al-Jassim, M.M., Appl. Phys. Lett., 81, (17) 31613162 (2002).Google Scholar
8. Grecu, D., Compaan, A.D., Young, D., Jayamaha, U., and Rose, D.H., J. Appl. Phys. 88 (5) (2000) 24902496.Google Scholar
9. Gessert, T.A., Romero, M.J., and Asher, S. E., Proc. NREL NCPV Review Meeting, Lakewood, CO, Oct. 14-17, 2001, pp. 189190.Google Scholar
10. Romero, M.J., Metzger, W., Gessert, T.A., Albin, D.A., and Al-Jassim, M.M., Proc. NREL NCPV Review Meeting, Denver, CO, March 24-26 (2003).Google Scholar
11. Romero, M.J., Gessert, T.A., Al-Jassim, M.M., Dhere, R.G., Albin, D.S., and Moutinho, H. R., Symposium F: Defect- and Impurity-Engineered Semiconductors and Devices III, Spring 2002 MRS Meeting.Google Scholar